Tools & Wizards About Us
grg.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

grg.org

Gerontology Research Group Index Page, as of [1997 - 2007]

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

111 ms

Resources Loaded

931 ms

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

grg.org screenshot

About Website

Visit grg.org now to see the best up-to-date Grg content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about grg.org

Gerontology Research Group

Visit grg.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Grg.org page load time and found that the first response time was 111 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

grg.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

grg.org

111 ms

grg.org

226 ms

header.html

57 ms

toc.html

123 ms

main.html

230 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Grg.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (374 ms) belongs to the original domain Grg.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 323.3 kB (30%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

767.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Grg.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 263 B

  • Original 571 B
  • After minification 483 B
  • After compression 308 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 88 B, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 263 B or 46% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 323.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 767.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Grg needs image optimization as it can save up to 323.0 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Grg. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

grg.org

grg.org

111 ms

grg.org

grg.org

226 ms

header.html

header.html

57 ms

toc.html

toc.html

123 ms

main.html

main.html

230 ms

grg_logo4.gif

grg_logo4.gif

161 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

161 ms

bkgrdDarkBlue.gif

bkgrdDarkBlue.gif

215 ms

hourglass.gif

hourglass.gif

148 ms

bkgrd.gif

bkgrd.gif

94 ms

CMiyako114.jpg

CMiyako114.jpg

146 ms

NTajima117d.jpg

NTajima117d.jpg

119 ms

MNonaka112a.jpg

MNonaka112a.jpg

245 ms

NTajima117.png

NTajima117.png

374 ms

NTajima117b.png

NTajima117b.png

366 ms

NTajima117c.png

NTajima117c.png

345 ms

VBrown117a.jpg

VBrown117a.jpg

199 ms

IKristal112.jpg

IKristal112.jpg

283 ms

EMorano117.jpg

EMorano117.jpg

364 ms

EMorano116.jpg

EMorano116.jpg

300 ms

SJones115.jpg

SJones115.jpg

290 ms

Accessibility Review

grg.org accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

grg.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

grg.org SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Grg.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Grg.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

grg.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Grg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: