Access grimgar.com. TVアニメ「灰と幻想のグリムガル」公式サイト

grimgar.com screenshot

48

Performance

Renders faster than
66% of other websites
90

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 74% of websites
75

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
35% of websites
92

SEO

Google-friendlier than
74% of websites

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

453 ms

grimgar.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Grimgar content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about grimgar.com

TVアニメ『灰と幻想のグリムガル』2016年1月放送開始！生きるって、簡単じゃない。記憶も、お金も、特別な力も―――、何もない僕たちが手に入れた現実。

Visit grimgar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Grimgar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value92.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.1 s

6/100

10%

grimgar.com

36 ms

css

40 ms

master.css

16 ms

home.css

18 ms

libs.min.js

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 243 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (237 requests) were addressed to the original Grimgar.com, 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Grimgar.com.

Content Size

28.8 MB

After Optimization

18.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Grimgar.com main page is 28.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 28.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 169.0 kB

Original 187.7 kB
After minification 132.6 kB
After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 55.1 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 169.0 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 10.1 MB

Original 28.5 MB
After minification 18.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Grimgar needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.1 MB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

Original 85.3 kB
After minification 85.3 kB
After compression 82.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

Original 8.6 kB
After minification 8.6 kB
After compression 6.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Grimgar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Now

242

After Optimization

235

The browser has sent 242 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Grimgar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

JA
Language Claimed

JA
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Grimgar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Grimgar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

grimgar.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Grimgar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: