Tools & Wizards About Us
grm.digital screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

grm.digital

Web Design & Digital Marketing Agency Leeds | GRM Digital

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

130 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

476 ms

grm.digital screenshot

About Website

Visit grm.digital now to see the best up-to-date GRM content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about grm.digital

Web Design Leeds and Digital Marketing Agency Leeds. GRM Digital are a full-service team of web design, development and marketing experts.

Visit grm.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Grm.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 130 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

grm.digital performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,060 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

grm.digital

130 ms

www.grm.digital

1054 ms

main.min.css

401 ms

embeded-forms.min.css

394 ms

conversionlogger.js

576 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Grm.digital, 3% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Grm.digital.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 181.4 kB (47%)

Content Size

388.4 kB

After Optimization

207.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Grm.digital main page is 388.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 262.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 32.2 kB

  • Original 41.6 kB
  • After minification 41.5 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 68 B
  • After minification 68 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GRM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 117.2 kB

  • Original 262.4 kB
  • After minification 262.4 kB
  • After compression 145.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 117.2 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 84.4 kB
  • After minification 84.4 kB
  • After compression 52.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Grm.digital needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (63%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GRM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

grm.digital

grm.digital

130 ms

www.grm.digital

www.grm.digital

1054 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

401 ms

embeded-forms.min.css

embeded-forms.min.css

394 ms

conversionlogger.js

conversionlogger.js

576 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

14 ms

jquery-3.6.3.min.js

jquery-3.6.3.min.js

369 ms

aos.js

aos.js

377 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

146 ms

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.min.js

578 ms

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js

382 ms

dropzone.js

dropzone.js

749 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

742 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

764 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

758 ms

logger.js

logger.js

844 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

935 ms

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

78 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

254 ms

cover-bg.svg

cover-bg.svg

656 ms

img-placeholder.png

img-placeholder.png

678 ms

services-bg.svg

services-bg.svg

687 ms

cta-bg.svg

cta-bg.svg

679 ms

footer-bg.svg

footer-bg.svg

849 ms

Montserrat-Bold.woff

Montserrat-Bold.woff

1142 ms

Montserrat-ExtraBold.woff

Montserrat-ExtraBold.woff

1311 ms

Montserrat-SemiBold.woff

Montserrat-SemiBold.woff

915 ms

Montserrat-Regular.woff

Montserrat-Regular.woff

981 ms

grm.ttf

grm.ttf

933 ms

uc.js

uc.js

36 ms

landing

landing

84 ms

Accessibility Review

grm.digital accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

grm.digital best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

grm.digital SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Grm.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Grm.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

grm.digital

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GRM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: