Tools & Wizards About Us
grog.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

grog.eu

GROG® – Finest Markers and Inks, Rigorously Handcrafted in Italy.

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

192 ms

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

338 ms

grog.eu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to grog.eu homepage info - get ready to check GROG best content right away, or after learning these important things about grog.eu

Grog designs and manufactures top notch marking tools to go all city, always with the artist in its mind. If you have hands, you are a styler.

Visit grog.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Grog.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 192 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

grog.eu performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.084

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

grog.eu

192 ms

www.grog.eu

898 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

290 ms

style.min.css

19 ms

styles.css

200 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Grog.eu, 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Grog.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 34.9 kB (1%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Grog.eu main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 30.2 kB

  • Original 38.4 kB
  • After minification 34.3 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GROG images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 95.4 kB
  • After minification 95.4 kB
  • After compression 93.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 45.9 kB
  • After minification 45.9 kB
  • After compression 43.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Grog.eu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (50%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GROG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

grog.eu

grog.eu

192 ms

www.grog.eu

www.grog.eu

898 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

290 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

19 ms

styles.css

styles.css

200 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

476 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

206 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

217 ms

css

css

32 ms

style.css

style.css

363 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

577 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

405 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1084 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

2086 ms

index.js

index.js

390 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

432 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

622 ms

jquery.mobile.touch.min.js

jquery.mobile.touch.min.js

499 ms

script.js

script.js

2083 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

621 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

3085 ms

cookiechoices.js

cookiechoices.js

3087 ms

ga.js

ga.js

105 ms

logo-grog.png

logo-grog.png

112 ms

landscape-grog-parthenope-summer-set-b4-LTD_01.png

landscape-grog-parthenope-summer-set-b4-LTD_01.png

135 ms

landscape-grog-cutter-08-BPI-25.png

landscape-grog-cutter-08-BPI-25.png

2925 ms

square-ink-marker-grog-squeezer-05-BPI-01-500x500.png

square-ink-marker-grog-squeezer-05-BPI-01-500x500.png

560 ms

square-ink-marker-grog-squeezer-10-BPI-01-500x500.png

square-ink-marker-grog-squeezer-10-BPI-01-500x500.png

2742 ms

square-ink-marker-grog-squeezer-25-BPI-01-500x500.png

square-ink-marker-grog-squeezer-25-BPI-01-500x500.png

1576 ms

landscape-grog-full-metal-paint-FMP-08-1000x727.jpg

landscape-grog-full-metal-paint-FMP-08-1000x727.jpg

1936 ms

landscape-grog-aqua-pro-paint-APP-08-1000x727.jpg

landscape-grog-aqua-pro-paint-APP-08-1000x727.jpg

1576 ms

square-paint-marker-grog-pointer-02-APP-03-500x500.png

square-paint-marker-grog-pointer-02-APP-03-500x500.png

1849 ms

square-paint-marker-grog-pointer-04-APP-03-500x500.png

square-paint-marker-grog-pointer-04-APP-03-500x500.png

2131 ms

square-paint-marker-grog-squeezer-mini-05-APP-03-500x500.png

square-paint-marker-grog-squeezer-mini-05-APP-03-500x500.png

1943 ms

landscape-grog-xtra-flow-paint-XFP-08-1000x727.jpg

landscape-grog-xtra-flow-paint-XFP-08-1000x727.jpg

1951 ms

landscape-grog-street-killer-ink-SKI-08-1000x727.jpg

landscape-grog-street-killer-ink-SKI-08-1000x727.jpg

1959 ms

square-paint-marker-squeezer-mini-05-FMP-36-500x500.png

square-paint-marker-squeezer-mini-05-FMP-36-500x500.png

1971 ms

square-paint-marker-squeezer-mini-10-FMP-36-500x500.png

square-paint-marker-squeezer-mini-10-FMP-36-500x500.png

3741 ms

square-paint-marker-squeezer-mini-20-FMP-34-500x500.png

square-paint-marker-squeezer-mini-20-FMP-34-500x500.png

2137 ms

logo-grog-small.png

logo-grog-small.png

2243 ms

TSB.ttf

TSB.ttf

2167 ms

TM.ttf

TM.ttf

2177 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

3471 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

3483 ms

inpage_linkid.js

inpage_linkid.js

16 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

Accessibility Review

grog.eu accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

grog.eu best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

grog.eu SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Grog.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Grog.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

grog.eu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GROG. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: