Tools & Wizards About Us
gromar.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

gromar.eu

GroMar - Platforma e-learningowa, Szkolenia dla firm, kursy online

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

337 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

gromar.eu screenshot

About Website

Visit gromar.eu now to see the best up-to-date Gro Mar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gromar.eu

Realizujemy szereg usług dotyczących nowoczesnych technologii i e-learningu. Opracowujemy strategie e-learningowe dla firm...

Visit gromar.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Gromar.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gromar.eu performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,930 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gromar.eu

337 ms

gromar.eu

1253 ms

styles.css

108 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

214 ms

style.min.css

322 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Gromar.eu, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Gromar.eu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 115.5 kB (24%)

Content Size

475.0 kB

After Optimization

359.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gromar.eu main page is 475.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 213.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 83.5 kB

  • Original 96.6 kB
  • After minification 68.8 kB
  • After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.8 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 28.6 kB

  • Original 213.1 kB
  • After minification 184.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gro Mar needs image optimization as it can save up to 28.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 147.1 kB
  • After minification 147.1 kB
  • After compression 145.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 18.1 kB
  • After minification 18.1 kB
  • After compression 16.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gromar.eu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (40%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

42

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gro Mar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gromar.eu

gromar.eu

337 ms

gromar.eu

gromar.eu

1253 ms

styles.css

styles.css

108 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

214 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

322 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

452 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

340 ms

widget.js

widget.js

259 ms

index.js

index.js

341 ms

index.js

index.js

336 ms

ue.js

ue.js

336 ms

wpcf7r-fe.js

wpcf7r-fe.js

425 ms

api.js

api.js

67 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

443 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

445 ms

index.js

index.js

444 ms

myscript.js

myscript.js

565 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

568 ms

owl.js

owl.js

573 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

105 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

265 ms

tag.js

tag.js

973 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

231 ms

logo_UE_rgb-1.jpg

logo_UE_rgb-1.jpg

564 ms

header-home-desktop.webp

header-home-desktop.webp

440 ms

ic-lw.svg

ic-lw.svg

228 ms

ic-platforma.svg

ic-platforma.svg

232 ms

ik-dedykowane-szkolenia.svg

ik-dedykowane-szkolenia.svg

348 ms

ic-szkolenia.svg

ic-szkolenia.svg

351 ms

ik-wsparcie.svg

ik-wsparcie.svg

354 ms

dpd.webp

dpd.webp

353 ms

intercars.webp

intercars.webp

357 ms

pepco.webp

pepco.webp

439 ms

orlen1.webp

orlen1.webp

456 ms

merck1.webp

merck1.webp

455 ms

suzuki1.webp

suzuki1.webp

459 ms

lot1.webp

lot1.webp

520 ms

dell-technologies-seeklogo.com_.webp

dell-technologies-seeklogo.com_.webp

558 ms

tzmo1.webp

tzmo1.webp

560 ms

warta1.webp

warta1.webp

560 ms

poczta-polska1.webp

poczta-polska1.webp

567 ms

logo-pkp.webp

logo-pkp.webp

631 ms

neuca1.webp

neuca1.webp

655 ms

ppl-1.webp

ppl-1.webp

657 ms

politechnika-lodzka3.webp

politechnika-lodzka3.webp

659 ms

uniwersytet-lodzki1.webp

uniwersytet-lodzki1.webp

658 ms

pwn1.webp

pwn1.webp

675 ms

skok1.webp

skok1.webp

735 ms

piotrkow_trybunalski_kolor_wersja-podstawowa_poziom.png

piotrkow_trybunalski_kolor_wersja-podstawowa_poziom.png

760 ms

Gdansk4.webp

Gdansk4.webp

764 ms

mbank-1.webp

mbank-1.webp

765 ms

OCHNIK___czarny-napis-scaled.jpg

OCHNIK___czarny-napis-scaled.jpg

899 ms

tlo.svg

tlo.svg

781 ms

marcin.png

marcin.png

843 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

186 ms

ewa.png

ewa.png

808 ms

maciek.png

maciek.png

814 ms

szteq.png

szteq.png

809 ms

logo-white.svg

logo-white.svg

832 ms

131781630768819

131781630768819

129 ms

fb.svg

fb.svg

901 ms

linkedin.svg

linkedin.svg

902 ms

insta.svg

insta.svg

902 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

788 ms

yt.svg

yt.svg

787 ms

optimize.js

optimize.js

97 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

59 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

75 ms

web-vitals.es5.umd.min.js

web-vitals.es5.umd.min.js

104 ms

65 ms

19 ms

16 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

748 ms

sync_cookie_image_decide

sync_cookie_image_decide

158 ms

Accessibility Review

gromar.eu accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

gromar.eu best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

gromar.eu SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    PL

  • Language Claimed

    PL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gromar.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gromar.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gromar.eu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gro Mar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: