Tools & Wizards About Us
ground-track.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

ground-track.com

GroundWidgets – the leading company in innovative software development for the ground transportation industry

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

53 ms

Resources Loaded

699 ms

Page Rendered

616 ms

ground-track.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ground-track.com now to see the best up-to-date Ground Track content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ground-track.com

Groundwidgets - the leading company in innovative software development for the ground transportation industry

Visit ground-track.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ground-track.com page load time and found that the first response time was 53 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ground-track.com performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ground-track.com

53 ms

www.groundwidgets.com

70 ms

main.css

20 ms

jquery.js

80 ms

core.js

160 ms

Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ground-track.com, 94% (103 requests) were made to Groundwidgets.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (316 ms) relates to the external source Groundwidgets.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (38%)

Content Size

7.7 MB

After Optimization

4.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ground-track.com main page is 7.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 67.0 kB

  • Original 86.1 kB
  • After minification 73.0 kB
  • After compression 19.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 2.8 MB

  • Original 7.4 MB
  • After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ground Track needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.8 MB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 48.7 kB

  • Original 193.6 kB
  • After minification 193.6 kB
  • After compression 144.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 13.3 kB
  • After minification 13.3 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ground-track.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 43% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (3%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

98

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ground Track. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ground-track.com

ground-track.com

53 ms

www.groundwidgets.com

www.groundwidgets.com

70 ms

main.css

main.css

20 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

80 ms

core.js

core.js

160 ms

common.js

common.js

51 ms

site.js

site.js

39 ms

css

css

34 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

10 ms

logo.png

logo.png

14 ms

drop.png

drop.png

13 ms

city.jpg

city.jpg

53 ms

cars.jpg

cars.jpg

48 ms

bridge.jpg

bridge.jpg

103 ms

man.jpg

man.jpg

51 ms

pattern.png

pattern.png

41 ms

corner.png

corner.png

53 ms

1.png

1.png

104 ms

1.png

1.png

103 ms

1.png

1.png

105 ms

1.png

1.png

106 ms

1.png

1.png

107 ms

1.png

1.png

108 ms

GroundXchange.png

GroundXchange.png

109 ms

gradient.png

gradient.png

109 ms

GroundMerchant.png

GroundMerchant.png

111 ms

GroundSpan.png

GroundSpan.png

109 ms

GroundApp.png

GroundApp.png

111 ms

SantaCruz.png

SantaCruz.png

112 ms

GroundPad.png

GroundPad.png

112 ms

GroundTech.png

GroundTech.png

113 ms

GroundTalk.png

GroundTalk.png

115 ms

GroundTrack.png

GroundTrack.png

114 ms

birdy.png

birdy.png

114 ms

back.png

back.png

115 ms

G_SantaCruz_1.jpg

G_SantaCruz_1.jpg

115 ms

G_SantaCruz_2.jpg

G_SantaCruz_2.jpg

281 ms

G_SantaCruz_3.jpg

G_SantaCruz_3.jpg

285 ms

santacruz.png

santacruz.png

283 ms

G_Track_1.jpg

G_Track_1.jpg

298 ms

G_Track_2.jpg

G_Track_2.jpg

290 ms

G_Track_3.jpg

G_Track_3.jpg

294 ms

groundtrack.png

groundtrack.png

285 ms

G_Pad_1.jpg

G_Pad_1.jpg

281 ms

G_Span_1.jpg

G_Span_1.jpg

296 ms

G_Span_2.jpg

G_Span_2.jpg

278 ms

G_Span_3.jpg

G_Span_3.jpg

272 ms

G_App_1.jpg

G_App_1.jpg

256 ms

G_App_2.jpg

G_App_2.jpg

256 ms

G_App_3.jpg

G_App_3.jpg

252 ms

G_Xchange.jpg

G_Xchange.jpg

316 ms

G_Tech.jpg

G_Tech.jpg

203 ms

G_Merchant_1.png

G_Merchant_1.png

278 ms

groundtalk.png

groundtalk.png

213 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

210 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

210 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

212 ms

ChosenPayments.png

ChosenPayments.png

244 ms

Oag.png

Oag.png

209 ms

MobileTextAlerts.svg

MobileTextAlerts.svg

210 ms

TheQuoteBot.png

TheQuoteBot.png

256 ms

phone.svg

phone.svg

258 ms

support.svg

support.svg

272 ms

sales.svg

sales.svg

274 ms

2.png

2.png

108 ms

3.png

3.png

108 ms

4.png

4.png

109 ms

5.png

5.png

108 ms

2.png

2.png

111 ms

3.png

3.png

110 ms

4.png

4.png

112 ms

5.png

5.png

111 ms

6.png

6.png

111 ms

2.png

2.png

110 ms

3.png

3.png

110 ms

4.png

4.png

109 ms

5.png

5.png

108 ms

2.png

2.png

105 ms

3.png

3.png

101 ms

4.png

4.png

99 ms

5.png

5.png

98 ms

6.png

6.png

98 ms

7.png

7.png

97 ms

8.png

8.png

96 ms

9.png

9.png

95 ms

10.png

10.png

90 ms

11.png

11.png

90 ms

12.png

12.png

91 ms

2.png

2.png

90 ms

3.png

3.png

91 ms

4.png

4.png

93 ms

5.png

5.png

62 ms

6.png

6.png

61 ms

Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff

Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff

59 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0aEww.woff

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0aEww.woff

78 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OqtKw.woff

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OqtKw.woff

95 ms

jizYRExUiTo99u79D0e0w8mO.woff

jizYRExUiTo99u79D0e0w8mO.woff

99 ms

jizdRExUiTo99u79D0e8fOydKxUb.woff

jizdRExUiTo99u79D0e8fOydKxUb.woff

109 ms

Roboto-Light-webfont.woff

Roboto-Light-webfont.woff

44 ms

7.png

7.png

68 ms

8.png

8.png

66 ms

9.png

9.png

62 ms

2.png

2.png

59 ms

3.png

3.png

59 ms

4.png

4.png

58 ms

5.png

5.png

74 ms

6.png

6.png

72 ms

7.png

7.png

80 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

70 ms

Accessibility Review

ground-track.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ground-track.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ground-track.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ground-track.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ground-track.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ground-track.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ground Track. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: