3.9 sec in total
1.4 sec
2.4 sec
113 ms
Visit groupama.es now to see the best up-to-date Groupama content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about groupama.es
Groupama Group - INSURING TOMORROW WITH CONFIDENCE
Visit groupama.esWe analyzed Groupama.es page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Groupama.es rating and web reputation
groupama.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value240 ms
85/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
1414 ms
453 ms
232 ms
257 ms
380 ms
Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Groupama.es, 6% (1 request) were made to Logi5.xiti.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Groupama.com.
Page size can be reduced by 142.5 kB (75%)
190.5 kB
48.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Groupama.es main page is 190.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 130.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.6 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 91.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Groupama.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (64%)
14
5
The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Groupama. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.groupama.com
1414 ms
global.css
453 ms
jScrollPane.css
232 ms
palette.css
257 ms
pops.css
380 ms
xtplug.js
261 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
994 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
382 ms
jquery.marquee.js
499 ms
portail.js
576 ms
xhtml-links.js
498 ms
jScrollPane.js
726 ms
popin.js
616 ms
bandeauCookies.js
627 ms
xtcore.js
477 ms
hit.xiti
326 ms
groupama.es accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
groupama.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
groupama.es SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Groupama.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Groupama.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
groupama.es
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Groupama. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: