Tools & Wizards About Us
grouparchitects.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

grouparchitects.in

Group Architects | Architect & Interior Designer in Pune | Architects in Pune

Page Load Speed

8.2 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

grouparchitects.in screenshot

About Website

Visit grouparchitects.in now to see the best up-to-date Group Architects content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about grouparchitects.in

Group Architects - Architect & Interior Designer in Pune providing creative ideas to Residential and Commercial Interior Designer and Architecture in Pune.

Visit grouparchitects.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Grouparchitects.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

grouparchitects.in performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,590 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.612

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

grouparchitects.in

1004 ms

bootstrap.min.css

245 ms

animate.css

475 ms

owl.carousel.css

474 ms

font-awesome.css

479 ms

Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (98 requests) were addressed to the original Grouparchitects.in, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Static.getbutton.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Grouparchitects.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 197.9 kB (6%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Grouparchitects.in main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 143.7 kB

  • Original 163.6 kB
  • After minification 105.8 kB
  • After compression 19.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 57.9 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Group Architects images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 19.1 kB

  • Original 427.3 kB
  • After minification 427.3 kB
  • After compression 408.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 88.8 kB
  • After minification 88.8 kB
  • After compression 79.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Grouparchitects.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (22%)

Requests Now

99

After Optimization

77

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Group Architects. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

grouparchitects.in

grouparchitects.in

1004 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

245 ms

animate.css

animate.css

475 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

474 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

479 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

477 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

478 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

483 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

712 ms

main.css

main.css

718 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

715 ms

css

css

38 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

730 ms

api.js

api.js

52 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

794 ms

tether.min.js

tether.min.js

728 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

999 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

1004 ms

jquery-waypoints.js

jquery-waypoints.js

1003 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

1008 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

1007 ms

numinate.min6959.js

numinate.min6959.js

1006 ms

main.js

main.js

1184 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

188 ms

logo-GA.png

logo-GA.png

518 ms

group-architects.jpeg

group-architects.jpeg

658 ms

best-architects-in-pune.jpg

best-architects-in-pune.jpg

891 ms

interior-designer-pune.jpg

interior-designer-pune.jpg

892 ms

bg1.jpg

bg1.jpg

1125 ms

spec-1.png

spec-1.png

656 ms

interior-design.png

interior-design.png

657 ms

home.png

home.png

871 ms

analytics.png

analytics.png

871 ms

chair.png

chair.png

880 ms

consulting.png

consulting.png

1106 ms

s.jpg

s.jpg

1107 ms

s.jpg

s.jpg

1111 ms

s.jpg

s.jpg

1120 ms

s.jpg

s.jpg

1123 ms

s.jpg

s.jpg

1342 ms

s.jpg

s.jpg

1343 ms

bg.svg

bg.svg

1347 ms

step1.png

step1.png

1359 ms

step2.png

step2.png

1359 ms

step3.png

step3.png

1361 ms

step-4.png

step-4.png

1578 ms

cover.jpg

cover.jpg

2283 ms

phone.png

phone.png

1583 ms

interior-design-firm-pune.jpeg

interior-design-firm-pune.jpeg

1597 ms

target.png

target.png

1597 ms

calendar.png

calendar.png

1598 ms

one-stop.png

one-stop.png

1811 ms

house-plans.png

house-plans.png

1699 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

90 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf

90 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

91 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

1679 ms

themify9f24.woff

themify9f24.woff

1624 ms

meeting-room.png

meeting-room.png

1622 ms

interiors.png

interiors.png

1835 ms

col-bgimage-2.jpg

col-bgimage-2.jpg

2078 ms

next1.png

next1.png

1825 ms

after.jpg

after.jpg

1560 ms

before.jpg

before.jpg

1547 ms

widget.js

widget.js

69 ms

init.js

init.js

144 ms

drag.png

drag.png

1633 ms

gaimage50.jpg

gaimage50.jpg

1660 ms

gaimage72.jpg

gaimage72.jpg

1637 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

44 ms

gaimage86.jpg

gaimage86.jpg

1447 ms

gaimage106.jpg

gaimage106.jpg

1649 ms

1.png

1.png

1636 ms

6.png

6.png

1645 ms

7.png

7.png

1656 ms

9.png

9.png

1448 ms

8.png

8.png

1447 ms

3.png

3.png

1646 ms

4.png

4.png

1639 ms

5.png

5.png

1648 ms

10.png

10.png

1665 ms

11.png

11.png

1450 ms

12.png

12.png

1449 ms

13.png

13.png

1646 ms

14.png

14.png

1646 ms

15.png

15.png

1649 ms

16.png

16.png

1667 ms

18.png

18.png

1454 ms

19.png

19.png

1445 ms

20.png

20.png

1632 ms

2.png

2.png

1642 ms

21.png

21.png

1646 ms

22.png

22.png

1451 ms

23.png

23.png

1444 ms

24.png

24.png

1433 ms

25.png

25.png

1578 ms

26.png

26.png

1553 ms

27.png

27.png

1432 ms

cc.png

cc.png

1428 ms

so.png

so.png

1429 ms

17.png

17.png

1429 ms

first%20policy.png

first%20policy.png

1422 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

1898 ms

s1.jpg

s1.jpg

1427 ms

s2.jpg

s2.jpg

1430 ms

s3.jpg

s3.jpg

1430 ms

s7.jpg

s7.jpg

1429 ms

Accessibility Review

grouparchitects.in accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

grouparchitects.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

grouparchitects.in SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Grouparchitects.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Grouparchitects.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

grouparchitects.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Group Architects. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: