2.6 sec in total
361 ms
1.8 sec
478 ms
Click here to check amazing Groupbrand content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about groupbrand.com
Visit groupbrand.comWe analyzed Groupbrand.com page load time and found that the first response time was 361 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
groupbrand.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value13.7 s
0/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value390 ms
68/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
361 ms
161 ms
5 ms
229 ms
32 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Groupbrand.com, 23% (14 requests) were made to and 7% (4 requests) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Groupbrand.com.
Page size can be reduced by 313.9 kB (13%)
2.5 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Groupbrand.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Groupbrand images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 263.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 263.9 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Groupbrand.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (21%)
43
34
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Groupbrand. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
groupbrand.com
361 ms
cpl7fpt.js
161 ms
font-awesome.min.css
5 ms
main.css
229 ms
js
32 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
8 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
185 ms
global.js
175 ms
d
263 ms
gb-logo.svg
90 ms
gb-icon.svg
171 ms
logo__ams.jpg
182 ms
logo__astrazeneca.jpg
179 ms
logo__atos.jpg
179 ms
logo__bae-systems.jpg
182 ms
logo__demandware.jpg
182 ms
logo__johnlewis.jpg
340 ms
logo__lumesse.jpg
340 ms
logo__marriott.jpg
341 ms
logo__monster.jpg
343 ms
logo__rbs.jpg
342 ms
logo__synchrony.jpg
342 ms
logo__vodafone.jpg
361 ms
Petro-1.jpg
638 ms
MonsterB2B-3b.jpg
646 ms
JLP-4.jpg
741 ms
Atos-4.jpg
735 ms
ECEX-1.jpg
474 ms
PRP-1.jpg
552 ms
RBS-3.jpg
739 ms
MonsterThankYou-5.jpg
904 ms
synchrony2.jpg
902 ms
Synchrony-India-Behind-the-scenes-1.jpg
820 ms
swivel2.jpg
999 ms
groupflow2.jpg
914 ms
BAE-4.jpg
1179 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3 ms
intro-header-4.jpg
767 ms
9DjgY3sdhRxx1zHEnnHTKaWecdc55F1yU7ZLLrrjqmutuyHHTLbfDG7vrnvseeCjXI3nyPfZEgacKPfNckRdeeuW1N94q9s57H34AuaVuywAA
14 ms
0OOBjex2FHHHXMcSecdMppZ5x1znkXXJTtksuuuOqa627IcdMtt8Mbu+ue+x54KNcjefI99kSBpwo981yRF1565bU33ir2znsffgC5pW7LAAA=
14 ms
9DjgY3sdhRxx1zHEnnHTKaWecdc55F1yU7ZLLrrjqmutuyHHTLbfDG7vrnvseeCjXI3nyPfZEgacKPfNckRdeeuW1N94q9s57H34AuaVuywAA
13 ms
0OOBjex2FHHHXMcSecdMppZ5x1znkXXJTtksuuuOqa627IcdMtt8Mbu+ue+x54KNcjefI99kSBpwo981yRF1565bU33ir2znsffgC5pW7LAAA=
13 ms
2XzJzDyloUAAAA=
13 ms
Q44GN7HYUccdcxxJ5x0ymlnnHXOeRdclO2Sy6646prrbshx0y23wxu76577Hngo1yN58j32RIGnCj3zXJEXXnrltTfeKvbOex9+ALmlbssAAA==
12 ms
9DjgY3sdhRxx1zHEnnHTKaWecdc55F1yU7ZLLrrjqmutuyHHTLbfDG7vrnvseeCjXI3nyPfZEgacKPfNckRdeeuW1N94q9s57H34AuaVuywAA
12 ms
9DjgY3sdhRxx1zHEnnHTKaWecdc55F1yU7ZLLrrjqmutuyHHTLbfDG7vrnvseeCjXI3nyPfZEgacKPfNckRdeeuW1N94q9s57H34AuaVuywAA
11 ms
0OOBjex2FHHHXMcSecdMppZ5x1znkXXJTtksuuuOqa627IcdMtt8Mbu+ue+x54KNcjefI99kSBpwo981yRF1565bU33ir2znsffgC5pW7LAAA=
10 ms
0OOBjex2FHHHXMcSecdMppZ5x1znkXXJTtksuuuOqa627IcdMtt8Mbu+ue+x54KNcjefI99kSBpwo981yRF1565bU33ir2znsffgC5pW7LAAA=
10 ms
9DjgY3sdhRxx1zHEnnHTKaWecdc55F1yU7ZLLrrjqmutuyHHTLbfDG7vrnvseeCjXI3nyPfZEgacKPfNckRdeeuW1N94q9s57H34AuaVuywAA
10 ms
0OOBjex2FHHHXMcSecdMppZ5x1znkXXJTtksuuuOqa627IcdMtt8Mbu+ue+x54KNcjefI99kSBpwo981yRF1565bU33ir2znsffgC5pW7LAAA=
10 ms
Q44GN7HYUccdcxxJ5x0ymlnnHXOeRdclO2Sy6646prrbshx0y23wxu76577Hngo1yN58j32RIGnCj3zXJEXXnrltTfeKvbOex9+ALmlbssAAA==
9 ms
0OOBjex2FHHHXMcSecdMppZ5x1znkXXJTtksuuuOqa627IcdMtt8Mbu+ue+x54KNcjefI99kSBpwo981yRF1565bU33ir2znsffgC5pW7LAAA=
9 ms
p.gif
126 ms
2B72AB_0_0.woff
713 ms
analytics.js
8 ms
collect
26 ms
common.js
7 ms
map.js
27 ms
util.js
25 ms
marker.js
24 ms
groupbrand.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
groupbrand.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
groupbrand.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Groupbrand.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Groupbrand.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
groupbrand.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Groupbrand. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: