Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

gscalltex.com

Quality Fuel Products & Clean Stations | Caltex Singapore

Page Load Speed

8 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

6.3 sec

Page Rendered

636 ms

gscalltex.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gscalltex.com now to see the best up-to-date Gscalltex content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gscalltex.com

Learn about Caltex Singapore's high quality products and services ranging from Techron Fuels to Lubricants, petrol stations and Caltex Cards.

Visit gscalltex.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gscalltex.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gscalltex.com performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value37.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,170 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.212

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sg

1116 ms

gtm.js

122 ms

headlibs.min.css

445 ms

csrf.min.js

658 ms

csrf.min.js

659 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Gscalltex.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Secure-ds.serving-sys.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Caltex.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 426.1 kB (50%)

Content Size

850.5 kB

After Optimization

424.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Gscalltex.com main page is 850.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 756.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 79.1 kB

  • Original 93.9 kB
  • After minification 73.1 kB
  • After compression 14.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.7 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 347.0 kB

  • Original 756.7 kB
  • After minification 756.7 kB
  • After compression 409.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 347.0 kB or 46% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (32%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

49

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gscalltex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gscalltex.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gscalltex.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

gscalltex.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gscalltex.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gscalltex.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gscalltex. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: