2.6 sec in total
456 ms
2 sec
155 ms
Click here to check amazing Gscripts content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gscripts.net
Free PHP scripts | Open source PHP library
Visit gscripts.netWe analyzed Gscripts.net page load time and found that the first response time was 456 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
gscripts.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
456 ms
172 ms
260 ms
237 ms
235 ms
Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Gscripts.net, 11% (12 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 6% (7 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (968 ms) belongs to the original domain Gscripts.net.
Page size can be reduced by 340.7 kB (50%)
682.8 kB
342.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Gscripts.net main page is 682.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 399.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gscripts images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 246.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 246.1 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gscripts.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (63%)
102
38
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gscripts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gscripts.net
456 ms
mtree.css
172 ms
template_css.css
260 ms
header.css
237 ms
module.css
235 ms
footer.css
239 ms
websnapr.css
259 ms
websnapr.js
317 ms
show_ads.js
7 ms
brand
15 ms
brand
35 ms
addthis_widget.js
31 ms
urchin.js
30 ms
button1-rss.gif
33 ms
body-bg.png
168 ms
body-shadow-br.png
190 ms
body-shadow-bl.png
189 ms
body-shadow-tr.png
167 ms
body-shadow-tl.png
169 ms
header-bg.png
166 ms
access-select.png
262 ms
access-fluid.png
286 ms
access-wide.png
259 ms
access-thin.png
258 ms
access-lrg.png
307 ms
access-med.png
330 ms
access-sml.png
407 ms
logo.png
419 ms
popular.gif
419 ms
new.gif
427 ms
rated.gif
451 ms
link.gif
470 ms
showcase-bg.png
520 ms
rss20.gif
511 ms
7694_screenshot_quick.cart.png
794 ms
rating_star.png
587 ms
rating_star_blank.png
604 ms
indent1.png
660 ms
7693_screenshot_quick.cms.png
926 ms
7683_retractablebanner-logo.jpg
662 ms
7682_php_no_script.jpg
728 ms
7662_php_no_script.jpg
744 ms
french_wide_color.gif
724 ms
german_wide_color.gif
779 ms
italian_wide_color.gif
866 ms
portuguese_wide_color.gif
871 ms
spanish_wide_color.gif
864 ms
japanese_wide_color.gif
894 ms
korean_wide_color.gif
930 ms
ca-pub-9976620069290226.js
147 ms
zrt_lookup.html
146 ms
show_ads_impl.js
76 ms
chinese_wide_color.gif
968 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
184 ms
ads
342 ms
osd.js
54 ms
__utm.gif
50 ms
300lo.json
77 ms
all.js&version=v2.0
78 ms
ads
353 ms
arabic_wide_color.gif
852 ms
english_us_wide_color.gif
859 ms
likebox.php
146 ms
side-bg.png
882 ms
content-bg.png
887 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
42 ms
ads
325 ms
footer-shadow-tr.png
871 ms
ads
313 ms
footer-shadow-tl.png
912 ms
pixel
21 ms
pixel
26 ms
pixel
29 ms
pixel
33 ms
pixel
26 ms
50 ms
xd_arbiter.php
39 ms
xd_arbiter.php
46 ms
pixel
26 ms
match-result
21 ms
match-result
20 ms
match-result
51 ms
roNeOY-tz5Y.css
25 ms
UHhaxo8Cs3k.css
30 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
46 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
60 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
60 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
69 ms
61508_432094871905_8267461_n.jpg
44 ms
547690_3930852426815_217896553_n.jpg
22 ms
12650986_1241749082506422_4750792398340780194_n.jpg
24 ms
12733361_1688271584795995_5072883105448591561_n.jpg
24 ms
1947955_10205145679695011_6932305696887479197_n.jpg
23 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
20 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
17 ms
pixel
19 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
3 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
4 ms
abg.js
56 ms
m_js_controller.js
46 ms
5149380849374465432
101 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
95 ms
s
62 ms
x_button_blue2.png
57 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
16 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
9 ms
ping
38 ms
ui
13 ms
like.php
79 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
10 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
5 ms
gscripts.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
gscripts.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gscripts.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gscripts.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gscripts.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
gscripts.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gscripts. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: