3.8 sec in total
488 ms
2.6 sec
622 ms
Click here to check amazing Gsptm content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gsptm.com
We specialize in Website designing and development, offering iONIC and other phnegap type hybrid apps
Visit gsptm.comWe analyzed Gsptm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 488 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
gsptm.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value13.7 s
0/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value410 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
488 ms
42 ms
55 ms
476 ms
286 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Gsptm.com, 14% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Gsptm.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (24%)
4.4 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Gsptm.com main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.6 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gsptm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 346.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 346.8 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 554.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gsptm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 554.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (64%)
47
17
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gsptm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gsptm.com
488 ms
css
42 ms
css
55 ms
bootstrap.css
476 ms
css3-panels.css
286 ms
icarousel.css
193 ms
template.css
1043 ms
responsive.css
588 ms
base-sizing.css
285 ms
updates.css
288 ms
custom.css
381 ms
pace.js
383 ms
modernizr.min.js
383 ms
jquery.min.js
479 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js
479 ms
platform.js
480 ms
pinit.js
570 ms
bootstrap.min.js
389 ms
kl-plugins.js
392 ms
smoothscroll.js
391 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-packed.js
576 ms
kl-testimonials-carousel.js
484 ms
kl-recent-work-carousel.js
487 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
490 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
591 ms
kl-portfolio-sortable.js
580 ms
kl-screenshot-box.js
583 ms
icarousel.packed.js
586 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
671 ms
raphael-min.js
771 ms
kl-icarousel.js
679 ms
jquery.gmap.min.js
683 ms
js
36 ms
kl-google-maps.js
687 ms
kl-scripts.js
767 ms
kl-custom.js
774 ms
jquery-1.10.1.min.js
193 ms
analytics.js
133 ms
sdk.js
132 ms
fbevents.js
133 ms
logo_2016_W_180.png
134 ms
callout2.svg
133 ms
hoverme.png
112 ms
say_hi.png
253 ms
web_development.jpg
360 ms
software_development.jpg
266 ms
graphic_designing.jpg
359 ms
mobile_development.jpg
360 ms
main.jpg
1043 ms
main_abk.jpg
646 ms
main_laojee.jpg
553 ms
main1.jpg
557 ms
1111.jpg
647 ms
photo-1431578500526-4d9613015464-resized.jpg
558 ms
twitter-bird.png
650 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
103 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
104 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
104 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
104 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
105 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
20 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
21 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
528 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
21 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf
20 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf
21 ms
fontello4fee.woff
547 ms
icomoonfdba.ttf
619 ms
widgets.js
596 ms
date.php
556 ms
gsptm.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gsptm.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
gsptm.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gsptm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gsptm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gsptm.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gsptm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: