1.5 sec in total
385 ms
871 ms
205 ms
Visit gstrack.com now to see the best up-to-date Gstrack content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gstrack.com
Visit gstrack.comWe analyzed Gstrack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 385 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
gstrack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value3.0 s
78/100
25%
Value3.3 s
91/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value3.0 s
96/100
10%
385 ms
68 ms
42 ms
45 ms
46 ms
Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Gstrack.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (385 ms) belongs to the original domain Gstrack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 236.7 kB (44%)
533.1 kB
296.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Gstrack.com main page is 533.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 321.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gstrack needs image optimization as it can save up to 61.7 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 20.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 20.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 149.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gstrack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 149.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (27%)
11
8
The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gstrack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
385 ms
gpf.css
68 ms
pap4.css
42 ms
pap4.css
45 ms
custom.css
46 ms
trackjs.php
122 ms
gs-logo-1.png
310 ms
affiliates_bg.jpg
195 ms
transparent.png
68 ms
social_buttons_3.png
93 ms
app_market.png
101 ms
track.php
113 ms
gstrack.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
gstrack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gstrack.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gstrack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gstrack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gstrack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gstrack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: