2.1 sec in total
91 ms
1.7 sec
337 ms
Click here to check amazing Gtt content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gtt.com
Opticom technology changes the way your city moves through industry-leading solutions for traffic, transit, and emergency services.
Visit gtt.comWe analyzed Gtt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 91 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
gtt.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.3 s
0/100
10%
Value16.6 s
0/100
25%
Value64.9 s
0/100
10%
Value70,570 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.719
6/100
15%
Value108.6 s
0/100
10%
91 ms
724 ms
39 ms
94 ms
88 ms
Our browser made a total of 122 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Gtt.com, 24% (29 requests) were made to Gtt.wpengine.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (724 ms) belongs to the original domain Gtt.com.
Page size can be reduced by 698.8 kB (45%)
1.6 MB
865.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Gtt.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 713.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gtt images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 396.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 396.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 201.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gtt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 201.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (33%)
87
58
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gtt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gtt.com
91 ms
www.gtt.com
724 ms
style.css
39 ms
styles.css
94 ms
settings.css
88 ms
prettyPhoto.css
92 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
95 ms
font-awesome.css
94 ms
eislideshow.css
98 ms
shortcodes.css
98 ms
responsive.css
102 ms
flexslider.css
104 ms
jquery.js
108 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
101 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
126 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
144 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
100 ms
hoverIntent.js
100 ms
superfish.js
121 ms
jquery.preloadify.min.js
140 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
154 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
154 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
152 ms
jquery.eislideshow.js
157 ms
css
135 ms
jquery.form.min.js
143 ms
scripts.js
219 ms
jquery.rwdImageMaps.min.js
218 ms
sys_custom.js
222 ms
comment-reply.min.js
219 ms
wp-embed.min.js
222 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
168 ms
GTT_SliderTSP_back.jpg
248 ms
ga.js
213 ms
GTT_SliderTSP_head.png
215 ms
GTT_SliderTSP_copy1.png
215 ms
GTT_SliderTSP_copy2.png
220 ms
GTT_SliderTSP_copy3.png
215 ms
tsp_logo_slider.png
221 ms
GTT_SliderCMS_back.jpg
217 ms
GTT_SliderCMS_head.png
219 ms
GTT_SliderCMS_copy1.png
226 ms
GTT_SliderCMS_copy2.png
226 ms
GTT_SliderCMS_copy3.png
228 ms
cms_slider_logo.png
230 ms
GTT_SliderEVP_back.jpg
230 ms
GTT_SliderEVP_head.png
232 ms
GTT_SliderEVP_copy1.png
237 ms
GTT_SliderEVP_copy2.png
241 ms
GTT_SliderEVP_copy3.png
238 ms
evp_logo_slider.png
244 ms
GTT_SliderMulti_back4.jpg
243 ms
GTT_SliderMulti_copy1.png
244 ms
GTT_SliderMulti_copy2.png
251 ms
GTT_SliderMulti_head2.png
253 ms
GTT_SliderMulti_copy3_3.png
251 ms
mm_logo_slider.png
257 ms
opticom_msging_01.png
256 ms
opticom_msging3_03.png
256 ms
AddaCity_tab.jpg
260 ms
OpticomVideo_new_Tab.jpg
264 ms
footerbugs6.png
264 ms
GTT_logo2.png
212 ms
header_shadow.png
213 ms
menu_sep.png
213 ms
GTT_Slider_TransitWebinarBack.jpg
228 ms
GTT_Slider_TransitWebinarMap.png
217 ms
GTT_Slider_TransitWebinarCopy.png
213 ms
GTT_Slider_TransitWebinarView.png
223 ms
Speed-Count-Class-9004-302x133.jpg
238 ms
OpticomVideo_new.jpg
224 ms
transit_video_homepage.jpg
242 ms
Canoga_WebinarWeb220x85.jpg
231 ms
Webinar302x133-2-300x132.jpg
236 ms
Picture1-150x150.jpg
240 ms
MNdot_video_tab.jpg
238 ms
TransitVideo_tab.jpg
246 ms
memphis_CS_homepage.jpg
252 ms
MNdot_caseStudy.jpg
251 ms
hanover_cs_tab.jpg
255 ms
plus.png
249 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
222 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
235 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
233 ms
GTT_SliderTSP_back.jpg
274 ms
top_arrow.png
261 ms
loader.gif
262 ms
coloredbg.png
262 ms
shadow2.png
263 ms
bullet.png
261 ms
small_left.png
263 ms
small_right.png
265 ms
GTT_SliderTSP_head.png
264 ms
GTT_SliderTSP_copy1.png
263 ms
GTT_SliderTSP_copy3.png
263 ms
GTT_SliderCMS_back.jpg
262 ms
GTT_SliderTSP_copy2.png
263 ms
GTT_SliderCMS_head.png
262 ms
tsp_logo_slider.png
262 ms
GTT_SliderCMS_copy1.png
259 ms
GTT_SliderCMS_copy2.png
257 ms
GTT_SliderCMS_copy3.png
256 ms
cms_slider_logo.png
256 ms
GTT_SliderEVP_back.jpg
262 ms
GTT_SliderEVP_head.png
254 ms
GTT_SliderEVP_copy1.png
249 ms
GTT_SliderEVP_copy3.png
249 ms
GTT_SliderEVP_copy2.png
246 ms
GTT_SliderMulti_back4.jpg
254 ms
evp_logo_slider.png
245 ms
GTT_SliderMulti_copy1.png
244 ms
GTT_SliderMulti_copy2.png
239 ms
GTT_SliderMulti_copy3_3.png
239 ms
GTT_SliderMulti_head2.png
239 ms
opticom_msging_01.png
238 ms
mm_logo_slider.png
238 ms
opticom_msging3_03.png
238 ms
AddaCity_tab.jpg
234 ms
OpticomVideo_new_Tab.jpg
232 ms
footerbugs6.png
231 ms
__utm.gif
50 ms
collect
140 ms
gtt.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gtt.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gtt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gtt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gtt.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gtt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: