Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

gtvital.com

GtVital - Worldwide canabis growing connection in one place

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

349 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

gtvital.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gt Vital content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gtvital.com

We connect worldwide wholesale suppliers, manufacturers, investors, buyers and sellers in a cannabis growing industry

Visit gtvital.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gtvital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 349 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gtvital.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.9 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.5 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gtvital.com

349 ms

gtvital.com

564 ms

theme-style.css

217 ms

modernizr.js

327 ms

less.js

543 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Gtvital.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Gtvital.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (48%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Gtvital.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 951.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 34.6 kB

  • Original 39.7 kB
  • After minification 25.3 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.3 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 861.3 kB
  • After minification 858.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gt Vital images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 647.0 kB

  • Original 951.8 kB
  • After minification 832.6 kB
  • After compression 304.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 647.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 442.4 kB

  • Original 501.7 kB
  • After minification 406.4 kB
  • After compression 59.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gtvital.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 442.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (71%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gt Vital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gtvital.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gtvital.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gtvital.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gtvital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gtvital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gt Vital. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: