Tools & Wizards About Us
guardian-angel-carers.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

guardian-angel-carers.co.uk

Home Care Services, UK Home Care Company | Guardian Angel Carers

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

200 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

458 ms

guardian-angel-carers.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Guardian Angel Carers content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about guardian-angel-carers.co.uk

Guardian Angel Carers provide outstanding home care in the comfort of your own home. We work closely with you and your family to create personalised care plans.

Visit guardian-angel-carers.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Guardian-angel-carers.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

guardian-angel-carers.co.uk performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,420 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.3 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.gacarers.co.uk

200 ms

www.gacarers.co.uk

496 ms

lud7vcz.css

63 ms

frontend.css

156 ms

main.css

310 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Guardian-angel-carers.co.uk, 5% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Gacarers.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 283.9 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

815.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Guardian-angel-carers.co.uk main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 369.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 189.6 kB

  • Original 235.0 kB
  • After minification 230.6 kB
  • After compression 45.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 189.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 294.4 kB
  • After minification 285.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Guardian Angel Carers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 36.2 kB

  • Original 369.4 kB
  • After minification 369.4 kB
  • After compression 333.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 48.7 kB

  • Original 200.5 kB
  • After minification 200.5 kB
  • After compression 151.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Guardian-angel-carers.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (83%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Guardian Angel Carers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.gacarers.co.uk

www.gacarers.co.uk

200 ms

www.gacarers.co.uk

www.gacarers.co.uk

496 ms

lud7vcz.css

lud7vcz.css

63 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

156 ms

main.css

main.css

310 ms

update.css

update.css

235 ms

jet-elements.css

jet-elements.css

320 ms

jet-elements-skin.css

jet-elements-skin.css

242 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

241 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

328 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

318 ms

post-2484.css

post-2484.css

334 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

398 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

386 ms

post-2762.css

post-2762.css

393 ms

post-3600.css

post-3600.css

391 ms

post-3975.css

post-3975.css

395 ms

post-3941.css

post-3941.css

396 ms

post-4056.css

post-4056.css

462 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

468 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

479 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

474 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

475 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

475 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

31 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

547 ms

widget-call-to-action.min.css

widget-call-to-action.min.css

548 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

548 ms

widget-theme-elements.min.css

widget-theme-elements.min.css

551 ms

p.css

p.css

36 ms

seamless.js

seamless.js

44 ms

basic.min.css

basic.min.css

483 ms

theme-ie11.min.css

theme-ie11.min.css

619 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

618 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

618 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

620 ms

main.js

main.js

619 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

620 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

674 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

674 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

673 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

594 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

517 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

509 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

560 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

487 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

477 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

476 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

470 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

511 ms

jet-plugins.js

jet-plugins.js

537 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

529 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

528 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

526 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

581 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

535 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

561 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

550 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

551 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

548 ms

jet-elements.min.js

jet-elements.min.js

551 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

185 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

622 ms

d

d

7 ms

d

d

140 ms

d

d

140 ms

heart-home.svg

heart-home.svg

621 ms

Group-826.png

Group-826.png

1245 ms

footer-img.png

footer-img.png

620 ms

CQC-Regulated-300x141.png

CQC-Regulated-300x141.png

551 ms

footer-logo-two.png

footer-logo-two.png

485 ms

footer-logo-three.png

footer-logo-three.png

488 ms

footer-logo-four.png

footer-logo-four.png

979 ms

Female-Carer-lone-Web-GAC-scaled.jpg

Female-Carer-lone-Web-GAC-scaled.jpg

1182 ms

Polygon-6.svg

Polygon-6.svg

946 ms

Lucida-Handwriting-Italic.woff

Lucida-Handwriting-Italic.woff

936 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1026 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

75 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

145 ms

destination

destination

71 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

145 ms

84 ms

collect

collect

24 ms

js

js

43 ms

js

js

110 ms

js

js

231 ms

519338682357306

519338682357306

202 ms

195 ms

508 ms

28.d771aa1f2395b61ad1c5.js

28.d771aa1f2395b61ad1c5.js

59 ms

204.31c3b0f04d1af2049612.js

204.31c3b0f04d1af2049612.js

70 ms

Accessibility Review

guardian-angel-carers.co.uk accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

guardian-angel-carers.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

guardian-angel-carers.co.uk SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Guardian-angel-carers.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Guardian-angel-carers.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

guardian-angel-carers.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Guardian Angel Carers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: