Tools & Wizards About Us
gueststream.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

gueststream.com

Property management solutions for growing companies - TravelNet Solutions

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

638 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

322 ms

gueststream.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gueststream.com now to see the best up-to-date Gueststream content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gueststream.com

TravelNet Solutions is transforming how hospitality works. Our software and services create operational efficiencies for sustainable growth.

Visit gueststream.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gueststream.com page load time and found that the first response time was 638 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gueststream.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.112

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.gueststream.com

638 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

31 ms

styles.css

74 ms

css

25 ms

genericons.css

112 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Gueststream.com, 21% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (638 ms) belongs to the original domain Gueststream.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 365.1 kB (32%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

780.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gueststream.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 665.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 31.7 kB

  • Original 40.2 kB
  • After minification 36.7 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 14.4 kB

  • Original 665.0 kB
  • After minification 650.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gueststream images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 154.0 kB

  • Original 232.2 kB
  • After minification 229.1 kB
  • After compression 78.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 154.0 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 164.9 kB

  • Original 207.7 kB
  • After minification 179.7 kB
  • After compression 42.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gueststream.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 164.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (66%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gueststream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.gueststream.com

www.gueststream.com

638 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

31 ms

styles.css

styles.css

74 ms

css

css

25 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

112 ms

gueststream.css

gueststream.css

58 ms

style.css

style.css

95 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

75 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css

60 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

117 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

89 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

109 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

109 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

151 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

151 ms

functions.js

functions.js

152 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

154 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

159 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

158 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

159 ms

spinner.min.js

spinner.min.js

163 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js

163 ms

jquery.easing.pack.js

jquery.easing.pack.js

172 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

172 ms

guestreamlogo.png

guestreamlogo.png

103 ms

cropped-header.jpg

cropped-header.jpg

258 ms

connector-final.png

connector-final.png

102 ms

logo-welcomeapp-1.png

logo-welcomeapp-1.png

103 ms

irm-1.jpg

irm-1.jpg

103 ms

maisha_front_about_bg2.jpg

maisha_front_about_bg2.jpg

104 ms

gueststreamlogotrans.png

gueststreamlogotrans.png

104 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

39 ms

Li18TEFObx_yGdzKDoI_cr3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

Li18TEFObx_yGdzKDoI_cr3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

17 ms

KZIBeBMugm8Hv3hZPrGeCwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff

KZIBeBMugm8Hv3hZPrGeCwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff

17 ms

ZKwULyCG95tk6mOqHQfRBL3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

ZKwULyCG95tk6mOqHQfRBL3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

22 ms

cbAbzEjxTdN5KKmS-gA0tb3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

cbAbzEjxTdN5KKmS-gA0tb3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

22 ms

rr0ijB5_2nAJsAoZ6vECXbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

rr0ijB5_2nAJsAoZ6vECXbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff

23 ms

STBOO2waD2LpX45SXYjQBb3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

STBOO2waD2LpX45SXYjQBb3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

22 ms

WmVKXVcOuffP_qmCpFuyzb3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

WmVKXVcOuffP_qmCpFuyzb3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

21 ms

QoPu455RxV2raYSIFXAMBb3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

QoPu455RxV2raYSIFXAMBb3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

21 ms

Ji5epXNcpHu3r63lhS0cTr3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

Ji5epXNcpHu3r63lhS0cTr3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

36 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

86 ms

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgjO2i86D6AshzNIwGgBAmQUAAAA=

4 ms

Accessibility Review

gueststream.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gueststream.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gueststream.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gueststream.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gueststream.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gueststream.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gueststream. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: