Tools & Wizards About Us
gulfcoastsilkscreening.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

gulfcoastsilkscreening.com

Gulf Coast Silk Screening & A to Z Embroidery | Biloxi, MS: Home

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

562 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

gulfcoastsilkscreening.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gulfcoastsilkscreening.com homepage info - get ready to check Gulf Coast Silk Screening best content right away, or after learning these important things about gulfcoastsilkscreening.com

Gulf Coast Silk Screening. Best selection of promotional items, apparel and corporate gifts. Let us earn your business with our 1st class service and low prices. Custom screening printing & embroidery...

Visit gulfcoastsilkscreening.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gulfcoastsilkscreening.com page load time and found that the first response time was 562 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gulfcoastsilkscreening.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.269

45/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.brandedimprints.com

562 ms

bootstrap.min.css

85 ms

css

30 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

121 ms

flexslider.css

146 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Gulfcoastsilkscreening.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (972 ms) relates to the external source Brandedimprints.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 292.5 kB (7%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

4.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gulfcoastsilkscreening.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 84.1 kB

  • Original 100.4 kB
  • After minification 92.0 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 167.7 kB

  • Original 4.0 MB
  • After minification 3.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gulf Coast Silk Screening images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 206.9 kB
  • After minification 206.4 kB
  • After compression 198.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

  • Original 186.8 kB
  • After minification 186.8 kB
  • After compression 154.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gulfcoastsilkscreening.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (37%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

52

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gulf Coast Silk Screening. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.brandedimprints.com

www.brandedimprints.com

562 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

85 ms

css

css

30 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

121 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

146 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

191 ms

slick.css

slick.css

159 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

160 ms

yamm.css

yamm.css

163 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

164 ms

StyleSheet

StyleSheet

319 ms

gulf-coast-silk-screening.png

gulf-coast-silk-screening.png

287 ms

msp-websotre-logo.png

msp-websotre-logo.png

288 ms

Pic

Pic

302 ms

Utils.js

Utils.js

205 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

220 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

266 ms

migrate-3.1.0.js

migrate-3.1.0.js

255 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

294 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

301 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

318 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

318 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

329 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

383 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

383 ms

iframeResizer.min.js

iframeResizer.min.js

384 ms

IFrameUtils.js

IFrameUtils.js

384 ms

jquery.backstretch.min.js

jquery.backstretch.min.js

384 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

384 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

385 ms

datepicker-fr-ca.js

datepicker-fr-ca.js

385 ms

custom.js

custom.js

393 ms

highslide-full.packed.js

highslide-full.packed.js

394 ms

highslide.config.js

highslide.config.js

392 ms

highslide.css

highslide.css

397 ms

Pic

Pic

625 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

509 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

565 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

480 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

477 ms

QPic

QPic

345 ms

QPic

QPic

383 ms

QPic

QPic

406 ms

QPic

QPic

421 ms

QPic

QPic

457 ms

QPic

QPic

425 ms

QPic

QPic

426 ms

QPic

QPic

412 ms

QPic

QPic

391 ms

QPic

QPic

406 ms

QPic

QPic

399 ms

QPic

QPic

410 ms

QPic

QPic

390 ms

QPic

QPic

395 ms

QPic

QPic

397 ms

css

css

18 ms

QPic

QPic

407 ms

QPic

QPic

415 ms

QPic

QPic

418 ms

QPic

QPic

415 ms

QPic

QPic

382 ms

QPic

QPic

368 ms

QPic

QPic

392 ms

QPic

QPic

402 ms

QPic

QPic

405 ms

NavThumbPic

NavThumbPic

525 ms

NavThumbPic

NavThumbPic

550 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

99 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

544 ms

fa-light-300.ttf

fa-light-300.ttf

675 ms

fa-thin-100.ttf

fa-thin-100.ttf

653 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

812 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

559 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

191 ms

NavThumbPic

NavThumbPic

581 ms

NavThumbPic

NavThumbPic

546 ms

NavThumbPic

NavThumbPic

547 ms

NavThumbPic

NavThumbPic

639 ms

NavThumbPic

NavThumbPic

629 ms

NavThumbPic

NavThumbPic

627 ms

NavThumbPic

NavThumbPic

697 ms

WEBlogPic

WEBlogPic

702 ms

WEBlogPic

WEBlogPic

795 ms

WEBlogPic

WEBlogPic

783 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

677 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

754 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

748 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

750 ms

LinkPic

LinkPic

742 ms

Pic

Pic

738 ms

Pic

Pic

882 ms

Pic

Pic

972 ms

close.png

close.png

754 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

757 ms

prev.png

prev.png

725 ms

next.png

next.png

721 ms

custom.png

custom.png

37 ms

zoomout.cur

zoomout.cur

35 ms

loader.white.gif

loader.white.gif

36 ms

Accessibility Review

gulfcoastsilkscreening.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gulfcoastsilkscreening.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gulfcoastsilkscreening.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gulfcoastsilkscreening.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gulfcoastsilkscreening.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gulfcoastsilkscreening.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gulf Coast Silk Screening. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: