Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

gummybear.tech

Tech and IT Recruitment Specialists in Thailand · Gummy Bear Tech

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

144 ms

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

574 ms

gummybear.tech screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gummybear.tech homepage info - get ready to check Gummy Bear best content right away, or after learning these important things about gummybear.tech

Gummy Bear focuses on Tech and Information Technology / IT recruitment, specializing in web development, Open Source technologies, and cloud-based computing.

Visit gummybear.tech

Key Findings

We analyzed Gummybear.tech page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gummybear.tech performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.8 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.043

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gummybear.tech

144 ms

gummybear.tech

1088 ms

www.gummybear.tech

1685 ms

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

js

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Gummybear.tech, 32% (19 requests) were made to Ns-cached-facebook-images.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com and 17% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.aus-2.volcanic.cloud. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Prod-krakatoa-ap-southeast-2-681880508904.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 810.5 kB (28%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Gummybear.tech main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 739.1 kB

  • Original 888.4 kB
  • After minification 886.0 kB
  • After compression 149.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 739.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 71.4 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gummy Bear images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 124.2 kB
  • After minification 124.2 kB
  • After compression 124.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (33%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gummy Bear. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gummybear.tech accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gummybear.tech best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

gummybear.tech SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gummybear.tech can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gummybear.tech main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gummy Bear. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: