41.2 sec in total
4.1 sec
36.8 sec
256 ms
Welcome to gw2002.com homepage info - get ready to check Gw 2002 best content right away, or after learning these important things about gw2002.com
gw2002.com
Visit gw2002.comWe analyzed Gw2002.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.1 sec and then it took 37.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 4 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
gw2002.com performance score
4104 ms
1424 ms
793 ms
365 ms
1257 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Gw2002.com, 2% (1 request) were made to S11.cnzz.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Oz.cnzz.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Gw2002.com.
Page size can be reduced by 114.5 kB (22%)
518.2 kB
403.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Gw2002.com main page is 518.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 464.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.6 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gw 2002 needs image optimization as it can save up to 73.4 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gw2002.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (21%)
57
45
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gw 2002. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
gw2002.com
4104 ms
style.css
1424 ms
channel.js
793 ms
bodybg.jpg
365 ms
headbg.jpg
1257 ms
logo.jpg
1440 ms
gcms.jpg
1781 ms
gshop.jpg
4775 ms
gmobice.jpg
1442 ms
banner.jpg
5753 ms
400tel.jpg
3582 ms
bnbg.jpg
6792 ms
2010031232650297.jpg
2468 ms
2010031232674219.jpg
2662 ms
2010031232699345.jpg
2964 ms
2013112551482525.jpg
6908 ms
2013112551128201.jpg
7417 ms
2013112550664461.png
12103 ms
2013101963305117.jpg
9752 ms
2013101852336305.png
11578 ms
2013102940564665.png
12834 ms
2013101850093961.png
12517 ms
0_16.jpg
7906 ms
0_19.jpg
8398 ms
channel.jpg
8918 ms
0_21.jpg
9410 ms
0_30.jpg
13645 ms
0_17.jpg
10172 ms
0_23.jpg
10617 ms
1.jpg
11063 ms
0_25.jpg
11522 ms
0_31.jpg
11964 ms
0_34.jpg
12003 ms
casebg.jpg
13769 ms
2013101842600929.png
16247 ms
2013101840223745.png
19703 ms
2013101834541117.png
19704 ms
2013101642065401.png
14508 ms
2013073180250561.jpg
17849 ms
z_stat.php
1084 ms
linkbg.jpg
13453 ms
2010031243756125.jpg
16180 ms
2013110152668381.jpg
16022 ms
2010061843177173.jpg
17846 ms
2013110152735521.jpg
19662 ms
stat.htm
248 ms
core.php
1418 ms
2013110152751053.jpg
17829 ms
2013110152796849.jpg
18400 ms
2013110152826973.jpg
19529 ms
9.gif
836 ms
pic.gif
777 ms
2013110152848349.jpg
18444 ms
app.gif
888 ms
2013110152871333.jpg
17447 ms
2013110152893725.jpg
19742 ms
2013110152944741.jpg
17399 ms
2013110152988629.jpg
16936 ms
0_80.jpg
14966 ms
dbtp2.jpg
17740 ms
dbtp3.jpg
16050 ms
nopic.jpg
12999 ms
logo.gif
1826 ms
gw2002.com SEO score
ZH
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gw2002.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gw2002.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gw2002.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gw 2002. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: