11.9 sec in total
1.5 sec
9.8 sec
701 ms
Visit gwc.net now to see the best up-to-date Gwc content for Singapore and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gwc.net
长城会(GWC)成立于2008年3月27日,致力于打造全球最有影响力的移动互联网合作平台。我们希望连接世界,诚信天下,让移动互联网的生意更简单,创新让世界更美好!
Visit gwc.netWe analyzed Gwc.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 10.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
gwc.net performance score
1459 ms
1151 ms
518 ms
1255 ms
302 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Gwc.net, 66% (41 requests) were made to 7q5b7f.com5.z0.glb.qiniucdn.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn.staticfile.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.1 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.staticfile.org.
Page size can be reduced by 981.3 kB (31%)
3.2 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Gwc.net main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.2 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gwc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 483.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 483.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 372.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gwc.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 372.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (58%)
59
25
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gwc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gwc.net
1459 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1151 ms
layerslider.css
518 ms
1255 ms
bootstrap.css
302 ms
style.css
313 ms
responsive.css
383 ms
new.css
524 ms
owl.carousel.css
514 ms
owl.theme.css
322 ms
eventon_styles.css
329 ms
font-awesome.css
588 ms
fc_styles.css
583 ms
jquery.min.js
7071 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
714 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
877 ms
jquerytransit.js
537 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
849 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
553 ms
owl.carousel.js
932 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
903 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
949 ms
slicknav.css
720 ms
style.css
879 ms
modernizr.min.js
13 ms
jquery.slicknav.min.js
679 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
984 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
1068 ms
jquerytransit.js
1099 ms
eventon_dynamic_styles.css
719 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1073 ms
808 ms
1331 ms
global.js
1017 ms
ga.js
25 ms
__utm.gif
70 ms
language-menu.jpg
442 ms
gwc-logo-white-small-copy.png
380 ms
japanese.jpg
376 ms
gwc-logo-vector-web-tagline.png
374 ms
gwc-logo-hi-res-copy-copy.png
380 ms
5631.jpg
375 ms
1.jpg
378 ms
GHomeslide.jpg
379 ms
gwcfa.png
434 ms
ponyma.jpg
625 ms
Paulgraham_240x320-178x178.jpg
605 ms
ym.jpg
664 ms
20096251218221841.jpg
681 ms
dm.jpg
759 ms
mz.jpg
760 ms
gwc-concept.jpg
480 ms
DSC7229.jpg
1120 ms
Thought-Leader.jpg
1187 ms
Martin-Lau-Thought-Leade-2.jpg
1420 ms
pattern4.png
494 ms
skin.css
619 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
513 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
846 ms
blank.gif
46 ms
skin.png
430 ms
pd.js
7 ms
gwc.net SEO score
ZH
ZH
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gwc.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gwc.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gwc.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gwc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: