Tools & Wizards About Us
gynaecompanies.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

gynaecompanies.in

Gynae Companies | Best Gynaecology Products Medicine Company

Page Load Speed

11.6 sec in total

First Response

458 ms

Resources Loaded

10.8 sec

Page Rendered

381 ms

gynaecompanies.in screenshot

About Website

Visit gynaecompanies.in now to see the best up-to-date Gynae Companies content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gynaecompanies.in

Gynae Companies - Looking for the Best Gynaecology Products Medicine Company in India. Vist our website now for product list.

Visit gynaecompanies.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Gynaecompanies.in page load time and found that the first response time was 458 ms and then it took 11.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gynaecompanies.in performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,900 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.113

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gynaecompanies.in

458 ms

gynaecompanies.in

4915 ms

bootstrap.min.css

452 ms

style.css

686 ms

style.min.css

928 ms

Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (101 requests) were addressed to the original Gynaecompanies.in, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Gynaecompanies.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 389.8 kB (20%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gynaecompanies.in main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 188.1 kB

  • Original 213.7 kB
  • After minification 160.7 kB
  • After compression 25.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 53.0 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 188.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 182.8 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 844.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gynae Companies needs image optimization as it can save up to 182.8 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 590.6 kB
  • After minification 590.6 kB
  • After compression 584.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 143.2 kB
  • After minification 143.2 kB
  • After compression 130.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gynaecompanies.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (81%)

Requests Now

106

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gynae Companies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 66 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gynaecompanies.in

gynaecompanies.in

458 ms

gynaecompanies.in

gynaecompanies.in

4915 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

452 ms

style.css

style.css

686 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

928 ms

styles.css

styles.css

703 ms

rounded-thumbs.min.css

rounded-thumbs.min.css

712 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

714 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

715 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

915 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

966 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1208 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

971 ms

jquery.sidr.dark.css

jquery.sidr.dark.css

964 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

1157 ms

slider-pro.min.css

slider-pro.min.css

1161 ms

css

css

26 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

1203 ms

style.css

style.css

1431 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

1211 ms

pum-site.min.css

pum-site.min.css

1383 ms

css

css

36 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

31 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

1175 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

1241 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

1244 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

1245 ms

validator.min.js

validator.min.js

1390 ms

js

js

61 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

1469 ms

index.js

index.js

1469 ms

index.js

index.js

1490 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

1490 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

1491 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

1616 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1629 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1683 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

1705 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1715 ms

deprecated.min.js

deprecated.min.js

1714 ms

dom.min.js

dom.min.js

1841 ms

api.js

api.js

43 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

2099 ms

escape-html.min.js

escape-html.min.js

1682 ms

element.min.js

element.min.js

1468 ms

is-shallow-equal.min.js

is-shallow-equal.min.js

1469 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1459 ms

keycodes.min.js

keycodes.min.js

1573 ms

priority-queue.min.js

priority-queue.min.js

1650 ms

compose.min.js

compose.min.js

1484 ms

private-apis.min.js

private-apis.min.js

1479 ms

redux-routine.min.js

redux-routine.min.js

1443 ms

data.min.js

data.min.js

1545 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

1584 ms

wc-blocks-registry.js

wc-blocks-registry.js

1445 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

1481 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

1442 ms

wc-settings.js

wc-settings.js

1434 ms

data-controls.min.js

data-controls.min.js

1522 ms

html-entities.min.js

html-entities.min.js

1402 ms

notices.min.js

notices.min.js

1443 ms

wc-blocks-middleware.js

wc-blocks-middleware.js

1427 ms

wc-blocks-data.js

wc-blocks-data.js

1428 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

1426 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

1499 ms

primitives.min.js

primitives.min.js

1333 ms

warning.min.js

warning.min.js

1376 ms

js

js

61 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

56 ms

font

font

40 ms

font

font

56 ms

font

font

56 ms

blocks-components.js

blocks-components.js

1636 ms

blocks-checkout.js

blocks-checkout.js

1427 ms

order-attribution-blocks.min.js

order-attribution-blocks.min.js

1425 ms

wpcf7r-fe.js

wpcf7r-fe.js

1472 ms

collect

collect

36 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

1416 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

1449 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

1465 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1457 ms

jquery.sidr.min.js

jquery.sidr.min.js

1492 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1548 ms

jquery.sliderPro.min.js

jquery.sliderPro.min.js

1476 ms

jquery.matchHeight.min.js

jquery.matchHeight.min.js

1444 ms

jquery.marquee.js

jquery.marquee.js

1464 ms

theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js

theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js

1454 ms

script.js

script.js

1483 ms

fixed-header-script.js

fixed-header-script.js

1427 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1458 ms

site.min.js

site.min.js

1455 ms

index.js

index.js

1487 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1745 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1740 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1638 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1587 ms

img-1.png

img-1.png

1923 ms

Progesterone-Tablet-Manufacturers-in-India-150x150.jpg

Progesterone-Tablet-Manufacturers-in-India-150x150.jpg

1509 ms

IVF-PCD-Pharma-Companies-in-India-150x150.jpg

IVF-PCD-Pharma-Companies-in-India-150x150.jpg

1507 ms

Zithromax-Tablet-Third-Party-Manufacturer-150x150.jpg

Zithromax-Tablet-Third-Party-Manufacturer-150x150.jpg

1555 ms

Azithromycin-Tablet-Manufacturer-in-India-1-150x150.jpg

Azithromycin-Tablet-Manufacturer-in-India-1-150x150.jpg

1520 ms

Ferrous-Sulphate-Tablet-Supplier-in-India-150x150.jpg

Ferrous-Sulphate-Tablet-Supplier-in-India-150x150.jpg

1554 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

20 ms

Progesterone-Tablet-Manufacturers-in-India.jpg

Progesterone-Tablet-Manufacturers-in-India.jpg

231 ms

IVF-PCD-Pharma-Companies-in-India.jpg

IVF-PCD-Pharma-Companies-in-India.jpg

719 ms

Zithromax-Tablet-Third-Party-Manufacturer.jpg

Zithromax-Tablet-Third-Party-Manufacturer.jpg

509 ms

Azithromycin-Tablet-Manufacturer-in-India-1.jpg

Azithromycin-Tablet-Manufacturer-in-India-1.jpg

573 ms

Ferrous-Sulphate-Tablet-Supplier-in-India.jpg

Ferrous-Sulphate-Tablet-Supplier-in-India.jpg

430 ms

Calcium-Mnaufacutrers-in-India.png

Calcium-Mnaufacutrers-in-India.png

1129 ms

Top-Folic-Acid-Manufacturers-in-India.jpg

Top-Folic-Acid-Manufacturers-in-India.jpg

657 ms

infertility-PCD-companies-in-India.jpg

infertility-PCD-companies-in-India.jpg

664 ms

Gynae-Products-Manufacutrers.jpg

Gynae-Products-Manufacutrers.jpg

742 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

228 ms

Accessibility Review

gynaecompanies.in accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gynaecompanies.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gynaecompanies.in SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gynaecompanies.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gynaecompanies.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gynaecompanies.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gynae Companies. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: