Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

gynea.ru

Междисциплинарный форум акушеров-гинекологов, педиатров, дерматовенерологов, эндокринологов и специалистов функциональной и ультразвуковой диагностики

Page Load Speed

25.8 sec in total

First Response

87 ms

Resources Loaded

25.2 sec

Page Rendered

492 ms

gynea.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit gynea.ru now to see the best up-to-date Gynea content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gynea.ru

Междисциплинарный форум акушеров-гинекологов, педиатров, дерматовенерологов, эндокринологов и специалистов функциональной и ультразвуковой диагностики

Visit gynea.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Gynea.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 87 ms and then it took 25.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

gynea.ru performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.475

18/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gynea.ru

87 ms

gynea.ru

3771 ms

ga.js

33 ms

watch.js

6 ms

index.php

664 ms

Our browser made a total of 134 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Gynea.ru, 12% (16 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (11 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) relates to the external source Js.hotlog.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (19%)

Content Size

6.1 MB

After Optimization

5.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Gynea.ru main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 61.5 kB

  • Original 80.9 kB
  • After minification 80.9 kB
  • After compression 19.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 783.7 kB

  • Original 5.0 MB
  • After minification 4.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gynea needs image optimization as it can save up to 783.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 304.4 kB

  • Original 984.7 kB
  • After minification 984.7 kB
  • After compression 680.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 304.4 kB or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 12.3 kB
  • After minification 12.3 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gynea.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (54%)

Requests Now

118

After Optimization

54

The browser has sent 118 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gynea. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gynea.ru accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gynea.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gynea.ru SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gynea.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gynea.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gynea. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: