10.7 sec in total
3.7 sec
6.3 sec
659 ms
Visit gytanalytics.com now to see the best up-to-date GYT Analytics content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gytanalytics.com
GYT is a boutique consulting and intelligence firm, aiming to support, guide and inform executives and R&D developers on everything relevant...
Visit gytanalytics.comWe analyzed Gytanalytics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.7 sec and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
gytanalytics.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value14.3 s
0/100
10%
Value27.9 s
0/100
25%
Value23.3 s
0/100
10%
Value1,090 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.083
94/100
15%
Value29.1 s
0/100
10%
3672 ms
42 ms
422 ms
550 ms
282 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Gytanalytics.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Gytanalytics.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (68%)
4.1 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Gytanalytics.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 105.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.7 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GYT Analytics images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 638.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 638.8 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gytanalytics.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (65%)
75
26
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GYT Analytics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gytanalytics.com
3672 ms
js
42 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
422 ms
style.min.css
550 ms
styles.css
282 ms
stm.css
587 ms
extendify-utilities.css
572 ms
font-awesome.min.css
601 ms
bootstrap.min.css
832 ms
v4-shims.min.css
532 ms
all.min.css
694 ms
js
64 ms
js
18 ms
analytics.js
42 ms
font-awesome.min.css
568 ms
style.css
578 ms
main.css
1469 ms
select2.min.css
643 ms
header_builder.css
711 ms
css
64 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
714 ms
skin-custom.css
1317 ms
theme_options.css
601 ms
main.css
861 ms
js_composer.min.css
1545 ms
addtoany.min.css
854 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
849 ms
page.js
60 ms
jquery.min.js
996 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
985 ms
addtoany.min.js
997 ms
rbtools.min.js
1270 ms
rs6.min.js
1528 ms
js
57 ms
collect
41 ms
collect
27 ms
in.js
10 ms
freeCode
319 ms
css
15 ms
css
15 ms
js_composer_tta.min.css
998 ms
rs6.css
1010 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1134 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1136 ms
index.js
1154 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
1390 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1390 ms
select2.min.js
1512 ms
custom.js
1503 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1503 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1504 ms
vc-accordion.min.js
1475 ms
vc-tta-autoplay.min.js
1363 ms
vc-tabs.min.js
1415 ms
countUp.min.js
1394 ms
freeCode
902 ms
GYTAnalytics2.png
778 ms
dummy.png
259 ms
container-ship-6631117_1920-350x250.jpg
190 ms
internet-7849204_1920-350x250.jpg
777 ms
landscape-989617_1920-1-350x250.jpg
776 ms
image001-350x250.png
920 ms
dam-gd819565c4_1920-2-350x250.jpg
921 ms
%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%9D1-350x250.jpg
921 ms
accessibility-browsing-5g-business-businessman-choosing-1444337-pxhere.com_-350x250.jpg
783 ms
mobile-ga20658d29_1920-350x250.jpg
783 ms
DATASECURITY-350x250.jpg
922 ms
adult-blur-boss-business-288477-2-350x250.jpg
922 ms
satellite-3977165_1920-350x250.jpg
921 ms
cybersecurity-350x250.jpg
1048 ms
about-us.jpg
1309 ms
values_opensans.png
1200 ms
logo_default.svg
255 ms
sm.25.html
178 ms
eso.Ep5bSEmr.js
180 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
112 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
139 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
173 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
173 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
172 ms
stm.ttf
892 ms
contact-1.jpg
1090 ms
embed
487 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
463 ms
2-cO9IRs1JiJN1FRAMjTN5zd9vgsFF_5asQTb6hZ2JKZou4ViesC.ttf
333 ms
js
138 ms
sprite_connect_v14.png
33 ms
gytanalytics.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
gytanalytics.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
gytanalytics.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gytanalytics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gytanalytics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gytanalytics.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GYT Analytics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: