Tools & Wizards About Us
labelfinder.glamour.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

labelfinder.glamour.de

Frisuren, Mode, Trends, Stars - glamouröse Unterhaltung | GLAMOUR

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

144 ms

Resources Loaded

966 ms

Page Rendered

563 ms

labelfinder.glamour.de screenshot

About Website

Visit labelfinder.glamour.de now to see the best up-to-date Labelfinder GLAMOUR content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about labelfinder.glamour.de

Mode, Beauty, Frisuren, Stars und Liebe, aktuelle News und Trends, Beratung in Mode und Lifestyle - mit GLAMOUR sind Sie immer auf dem Laufenden.

Visit labelfinder.glamour.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Labelfinder.glamour.de page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

labelfinder.glamour.de performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,160 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.8 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

labelfinder.glamour.de

144 ms

labelfinder.glamour.de

288 ms

www.glamour.de

59 ms

otSDKStub.js

51 ms

gpt.js

148 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Labelfinder.glamour.de, 67% (32 requests) were made to Glamour.de and 13% (6 requests) were made to Assets.glamour.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (386 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (34%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Labelfinder.glamour.de main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 162.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Labelfinder GLAMOUR images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 1.6 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (76%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Labelfinder GLAMOUR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

labelfinder.glamour.de

labelfinder.glamour.de

144 ms

labelfinder.glamour.de

labelfinder.glamour.de

288 ms

www.glamour.de

www.glamour.de

59 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

51 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

148 ms

v6.js

v6.js

148 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

386 ms

6572.468949363be8ba424028.js

6572.468949363be8ba424028.js

122 ms

3215.ca2bfc54aedb3d22c4a4.js

3215.ca2bfc54aedb3d22c4a4.js

24 ms

2751.ea8ec5a18af537723ff7.js

2751.ea8ec5a18af537723ff7.js

130 ms

9975.cbf69c050e3b022cb601.js

9975.cbf69c050e3b022cb601.js

129 ms

9593.d1210c973951abdb56b3.js

9593.d1210c973951abdb56b3.js

129 ms

1630.37098c01caa917092816.js

1630.37098c01caa917092816.js

120 ms

2905.4bde49914df10f988151.js

2905.4bde49914df10f988151.js

118 ms

3998.2eb8b4aea0c5936cc5c6.js

3998.2eb8b4aea0c5936cc5c6.js

119 ms

1656.15cdcf76b273f939d7a7.js

1656.15cdcf76b273f939d7a7.js

122 ms

8961.89a364585549d1bd1e75.js

8961.89a364585549d1bd1e75.js

127 ms

1446.22d6d9f94ed1d7b0d9f6.js

1446.22d6d9f94ed1d7b0d9f6.js

127 ms

6549.ccc5c131c8e4119b9543.js

6549.ccc5c131c8e4119b9543.js

121 ms

4311.1fdf924e5976de424fd4.js

4311.1fdf924e5976de424fd4.js

129 ms

4695.057935567d7a340bc435.js

4695.057935567d7a340bc435.js

162 ms

1084.41892e36efd8d6bb1359.js

1084.41892e36efd8d6bb1359.js

162 ms

1804.9825ccd2cab5dc3b2c1a.js

1804.9825ccd2cab5dc3b2c1a.js

229 ms

5998.bc888a793f9c564b39c7.js

5998.bc888a793f9c564b39c7.js

161 ms

4057.6c7bad04bd04b9d50e0c.js

4057.6c7bad04bd04b9d50e0c.js

161 ms

220.a7964f54aa4a07059ce4.js

220.a7964f54aa4a07059ce4.js

161 ms

8916.eb63685f6248ab7c76ea.js

8916.eb63685f6248ab7c76ea.js

172 ms

3757.8f331021cf660a6ed5a9.js

3757.8f331021cf660a6ed5a9.js

227 ms

154.e265260c300406fbef1c.js

154.e265260c300406fbef1c.js

294 ms

9031.87b038e0bcc6e7080d71.js

9031.87b038e0bcc6e7080d71.js

227 ms

8613.2af7b0a21fe0cc94ee3e.js

8613.2af7b0a21fe0cc94ee3e.js

299 ms

presenter-bundles.15d8183fc8ba7cbe6f48.js

presenter-bundles.15d8183fc8ba7cbe6f48.js

297 ms

4c05084d-b955-4d94-a62e-7f1d64226596.json

4c05084d-b955-4d94-a62e-7f1d64226596.json

91 ms

HEIDI_COVERDIGITAL_SQUARE_2.3.%2520Kopie.jpg

HEIDI_COVERDIGITAL_SQUARE_2.3.%2520Kopie.jpg

122 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

190 ms

logo-reverse.svg

logo-reverse.svg

120 ms

nonbinary-wie-viele-geschlechter-gibt-es-stocksy-3301979.jpg

nonbinary-wie-viele-geschlechter-gibt-es-stocksy-3301979.jpg

116 ms

170524-Postromantisches-Zeitalter-Dating-Apps-Liebe-zersto%25CC%2588rt-Aufmacher.jpg

170524-Postromantisches-Zeitalter-Dating-Apps-Liebe-zersto%25CC%2588rt-Aufmacher.jpg

115 ms

060223-american-psycho-christian-bale-aufmacher-MCDAMPS_EC021.jpg

060223-american-psycho-christian-bale-aufmacher-MCDAMPS_EC021.jpg

115 ms

160524-internationaler-tag-gegen-homophobie-Heartstopper_S02_Image35.jpg

160524-internationaler-tag-gegen-homophobie-Heartstopper_S02_Image35.jpg

113 ms

140524-Podcast-Finanzen-5-informativsten-Audio-Ratgeber-Geld-Investments-Logo-Aufmacher.jpg

140524-Podcast-Finanzen-5-informativsten-Audio-Ratgeber-Geld-Investments-Logo-Aufmacher.jpg

113 ms

location

location

98 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

20 ms

otBannerSdk.js

otBannerSdk.js

70 ms

EBGaramond-VariableFont_wght.woff

EBGaramond-VariableFont_wght.woff

47 ms

DMMono-Medium.woff

DMMono-Medium.woff

67 ms

DMMono-Light.woff

DMMono-Light.woff

67 ms

DMMono-Regular.woff

DMMono-Regular.woff

66 ms

Accessibility Review

labelfinder.glamour.de accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

labelfinder.glamour.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

labelfinder.glamour.de SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Labelfinder.glamour.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Labelfinder.glamour.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

labelfinder.glamour.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Labelfinder GLAMOUR. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: