Tools & Wizards About Us
m.gianteagle.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

m.gianteagle.com

Citrix Login

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

68 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

233 ms

m.gianteagle.com screenshot

About Website

Visit m.gianteagle.com now to see the best up-to-date M Gianteagle content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about m.gianteagle.com

Visit m.gianteagle.com

Key Findings

We analyzed M.gianteagle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 68 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

m.gianteagle.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value26.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value71,460 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value94.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

m.gianteagle.com

68 ms

m.gianteagle.com

393 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.15.custom.css

25 ms

jquery.mobile-1.0.1.css

41 ms

jquery.mobile.structure-1.0.1.css

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original M.gianteagle.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Cloud.typography.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (497 ms) relates to the external source Ex.gianteagle.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 605.5 kB (56%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

478.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of M.gianteagle.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 507.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 12.9 kB
  • After minification 11.5 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 260.5 kB
  • After minification 259.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. M Gianteagle images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 384.5 kB

  • Original 507.3 kB
  • After minification 340.5 kB
  • After compression 122.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 384.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 209.6 kB

  • Original 303.3 kB
  • After minification 254.5 kB
  • After compression 93.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. M.gianteagle.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 209.6 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (68%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of M Gianteagle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

m.gianteagle.com

m.gianteagle.com

68 ms

m.gianteagle.com

m.gianteagle.com

393 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.15.custom.css

jquery-ui-1.8.15.custom.css

25 ms

jquery.mobile-1.0.1.css

jquery.mobile-1.0.1.css

41 ms

jquery.mobile.structure-1.0.1.css

jquery.mobile.structure-1.0.1.css

77 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

306 ms

default.css

default.css

62 ms

jquery-1.6.2.min.js

jquery-1.6.2.min.js

80 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.15.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.8.15.custom.min.js

94 ms

jquery.mobile-1.0.1.js

jquery.mobile-1.0.1.js

118 ms

history.js

history.js

90 ms

imgscale.jquery.js

imgscale.jquery.js

73 ms

history.adapter.jquery.js

history.adapter.jquery.js

87 ms

xdate.js

xdate.js

88 ms

xdate.i18n.js

xdate.i18n.js

92 ms

mobipick.js

mobipick.js

100 ms

mobipick.css

mobipick.css

104 ms

s_code.js

s_code.js

104 ms

masterPage.js

masterPage.js

103 ms

location.js

location.js

104 ms

jquery.smartbanner.js

jquery.smartbanner.js

111 ms

D9B8C4720CF6A5DBE.css

D9B8C4720CF6A5DBE.css

194 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

51 ms

header_logo.png

header_logo.png

40 ms

mdot_home_background.jpg

mdot_home_background.jpg

497 ms

small

small

47 ms

CallOutDot.png

CallOutDot.png

26 ms

ajax-loader.png

ajax-loader.png

26 ms

icons-18-white.png

icons-18-white.png

26 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

24 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

s89120222073979

s89120222073979

39 ms

Accessibility Review

m.gianteagle.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[aria-*] attributes are not valid or misspelled

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

m.gianteagle.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

m.gianteagle.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise M.gianteagle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that M.gianteagle.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

m.gianteagle.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of M Gianteagle. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: