2.3 sec in total
230 ms
1.9 sec
225 ms
Click here to check amazing Maps Google content for Cameroon. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about maps.google.cm
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
Visit maps.google.cmWe analyzed Maps.google.cm page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
maps.google.cm performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
69/100
10%
Value4.9 s
29/100
25%
Value3.3 s
91/100
10%
Value500 ms
58/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
230 ms
33 ms
67 ms
304 ms
136 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Maps.google.cm, 73% (66 requests) were made to Google.cm and 11% (10 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (845 ms) relates to the external source Maps.googleapis.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (61%)
2.8 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Maps.google.cm main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 673.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 673.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Maps Google images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 991.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 991.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (37%)
83
52
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Maps Google. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
maps.google.cm
230 ms
maps
33 ms
@
67 ms
@
304 ms
common.js
136 ms
logging_serialization.js
151 ms
util.js
180 ms
onion.js
178 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
836 ms
marker.js
160 ms
layers.js
177 ms
poly.js
176 ms
desktop_ui.js
156 ms
printing.js
174 ms
v1_8758f7bb.png
757 ms
rs=AA2YrTs33gabkwDr4JwYH8vF35mufGVgkg
742 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
845 ms
stats.js
135 ms
controls.js
124 ms
CrYjSnGjrRCn0pd9VQsnFOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
712 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
775 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
801 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOLO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
832 ms
controls_common.js
120 ms
desktop_controls.js
119 ms
closure_ui.js
180 ms
searchbox_library.js
294 ms
searchbox.js
400 ms
desktop_searchbox_ui.js
400 ms
cards.js
399 ms
desktop_cards_ui.js
573 ms
transparent.png
618 ms
mapcnt6.png
533 ms
sv5.png
533 ms
desktop_spritesheet.png
534 ms
googlelogo_color_74x24dp.png
358 ms
googlelogo_62x24_with_2_stroke_color_66x26dp.png
359 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
388 ms
kh
484 ms
kh
484 ms
kh
410 ms
kh
411 ms
tmapctrl.png
325 ms
cb_scout5.png
387 ms
tmapctrl4.png
386 ms
ic_directions_quantum.png
320 ms
spinner_color.gif
313 ms
@7.365302,12.343439,6z
200 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
198 ms
vt
99 ms
vt
80 ms
vt
74 ms
vt
76 ms
vt
72 ms
vt
82 ms
vt
101 ms
vt
94 ms
vt
99 ms
vt
108 ms
vt
112 ms
vt
130 ms
vt
133 ms
vt
132 ms
vt
128 ms
vt
139 ms
vt
145 ms
vt
177 ms
vt
178 ms
vt
155 ms
vt
159 ms
vt
179 ms
vt
181 ms
vt
199 ms
vt
198 ms
vt
206 ms
vt
218 ms
vt
216 ms
vt
212 ms
vt
216 ms
vt
229 ms
vt
240 ms
vt
258 ms
vt
270 ms
vt
250 ms
vt
230 ms
vt
208 ms
vt
218 ms
vt
208 ms
vt
192 ms
vt
216 ms
vt
225 ms
maps.google.cm accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
maps.google.cm best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
maps.google.cm SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Maps.google.cm can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Maps.google.cm main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
maps.google.cm
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Maps Google. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: