700 ms in total
23 ms
584 ms
93 ms
Welcome to maps.google.com.sa homepage info - get ready to check Maps Google best content for Saudi Arabia right away, or after learning these important things about maps.google.com.sa
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
Visit maps.google.com.saWe analyzed Maps.google.com.sa page load time and found that the first response time was 23 ms and then it took 677 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
maps.google.com.sa performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value3.1 s
92/100
10%
Value700 ms
42/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.4 s
60/100
10%
23 ms
24 ms
242 ms
185 ms
229 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Maps.google.com.sa, 58% (21 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com and 25% (9 requests) were made to Google.com.sa. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (271 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 976.8 kB (64%)
1.5 MB
540.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Maps.google.com.sa main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 968.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 968.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Maps Google images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (83%)
29
5
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Maps Google. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
maps.google.com.sa
23 ms
maps
24 ms
maps
242 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff
185 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff
229 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc-.woff
271 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff
239 ms
rs=ACT90oF2nnhzSgr0GJc-iTYNzfVkgb3FCQ
91 ms
rs=ACT90oF2nnhzSgr0GJc-iTYNzfVkgb3FCQ
83 ms
rs=ACT90oF2nnhzSgr0GJc-iTYNzfVkgb3FCQ
179 ms
rs=ACT90oF2nnhzSgr0GJc-iTYNzfVkgb3FCQ
158 ms
rs=ACT90oF2nnhzSgr0GJc-iTYNzfVkgb3FCQ
157 ms
rs=ACT90oF2nnhzSgr0GJc-iTYNzfVkgb3FCQ
187 ms
rs=ACT90oF2nnhzSgr0GJc-iTYNzfVkgb3FCQ
175 ms
ic_menu_burger_default_24dp.png
172 ms
signinphoto_96dp.png
182 ms
dir_drive_1x.svg
186 ms
dir_walk_1x.svg
189 ms
dir_bike_1x.svg
192 ms
all_transit_1x.svg
186 ms
dir_bus_1x.svg
190 ms
dir_metro_1x.svg
193 ms
dir_train_1x.svg
195 ms
satellite_1x.png
196 ms
transit_colors2_1x.png
197 ms
traffic_colors2_1x.png
196 ms
wildfires_colors2_1x.png
197 ms
air_quality_colors2_1x.png
198 ms
translate_1x.svg
198 ms
ic_arrow_down_gray_24dp.png
200 ms
feedback_1x.svg
211 ms
rs=ACT90oF2nnhzSgr0GJc-iTYNzfVkgb3FCQ
23 ms
ic_restaurant_white_24dp.png
23 ms
ic_gas_station_white_24dp.png
32 ms
ic_atm_white_24dp.png
34 ms
shopping_cart_white_24dp.png
34 ms
maps.google.com.sa accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
maps.google.com.sa best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
maps.google.com.sa SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Maps.google.com.sa can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Maps.google.com.sa main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
maps.google.com.sa
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Maps Google. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: