Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

maps.google.com.sa

Google Maps

Page Load Speed

700 ms in total

First Response

23 ms

Resources Loaded

584 ms

Page Rendered

93 ms

maps.google.com.sa screenshot

About Website

Welcome to maps.google.com.sa homepage info - get ready to check Maps Google best content for Saudi Arabia right away, or after learning these important things about maps.google.com.sa

Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.

Visit maps.google.com.sa

Key Findings

We analyzed Maps.google.com.sa page load time and found that the first response time was 23 ms and then it took 677 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

maps.google.com.sa performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

maps.google.com.sa

23 ms

maps

24 ms

maps

242 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff

185 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff

229 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Maps.google.com.sa, 58% (21 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com and 25% (9 requests) were made to Google.com.sa. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (271 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 976.8 kB (64%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

540.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Maps.google.com.sa main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 968.5 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 288.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 968.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 8.4 kB
  • After minification 8.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Maps Google images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 251.8 kB
  • After minification 251.7 kB
  • After compression 243.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (83%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Maps Google. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

maps.google.com.sa accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

maps.google.com.sa best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

maps.google.com.sa SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Maps.google.com.sa can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Maps.google.com.sa main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Maps Google. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: