Tools & Wizards About Us
rms-open-letter.github.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

rms-open-letter.github.io

An open letter to remove Richard M. Stallman from all leadership positions | rms-open-letter.github.io

Page Load Speed

287 ms in total

First Response

16 ms

Resources Loaded

271 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

rms-open-letter.github.io screenshot

About Website

Visit rms-open-letter.github.io now to see the best up-to-date Rms Open Letter Github content for China and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rms-open-letter.github.io

We, the undersigned, call for the entire Board of the FSF to step down and for Richard M. Stallman to be removed from all leadership positions. We will not continue suffering his behavior, giving him ...

Visit rms-open-letter.github.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Rms-open-letter.github.io page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 271 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rms-open-letter.github.io performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rms-open-letter.github.io

16 ms

rms-open-letter.github.io

58 ms

style.css

16 ms

a11y-menu.js

207 ms

minima-social-icons.svg

195 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rms-open-letter.github.io and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (207 ms) belongs to the original domain Rms-open-letter.github.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 95.8 kB (67%)

Content Size

142.4 kB

After Optimization

46.6 kB

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Rms-open-letter.github.io main page is 142.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 142.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 95.8 kB

  • Original 142.4 kB
  • After minification 135.4 kB
  • After compression 46.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rms Open Letter Github. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

rms-open-letter.github.io

rms-open-letter.github.io

16 ms

rms-open-letter.github.io

rms-open-letter.github.io

58 ms

style.css

style.css

16 ms

a11y-menu.js

a11y-menu.js

207 ms

minima-social-icons.svg

minima-social-icons.svg

195 ms

Accessibility Review

rms-open-letter.github.io accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rms-open-letter.github.io best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

rms-open-letter.github.io SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rms-open-letter.github.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rms-open-letter.github.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rms-open-letter.github.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rms Open Letter Github. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: