1.2 sec in total
30 ms
1.1 sec
78 ms
Welcome to staging.glamhive.com homepage info - get ready to check Staging Glamhive best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about staging.glamhive.com
Glamhive brings you the best online stylists. Choose your own personal stylist or get matched and collaborate with them for your very own personalized style recommendations.
Visit staging.glamhive.comWe analyzed Staging.glamhive.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
staging.glamhive.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value16.5 s
0/100
10%
Value20.0 s
0/100
25%
Value21.7 s
0/100
10%
Value13,680 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value32.1 s
0/100
10%
30 ms
40 ms
31 ms
43 ms
73 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Staging.glamhive.com, 12% (3 requests) were made to Js.stripe.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (763 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.
Page size can be reduced by 974.3 kB (86%)
1.1 MB
163.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Staging.glamhive.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 415.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 359.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 359.4 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 256.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 256.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 358.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Staging.glamhive.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 358.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (68%)
19
6
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Staging Glamhive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
staging.glamhive.com
30 ms
staging.glamhive.com
40 ms
css
31 ms
css
43 ms
libs.ef4cbfc0.css
73 ms
app.2e7efc02.css
100 ms
34 ms
env.d8987c1f.js
24 ms
libs.43056695.js
33 ms
app.f9fe78a5.js
210 ms
templates.82efd88a.js
30 ms
28c005a7631a42348e995024bb0d9a82.js.ubembed.com
208 ms
klaviyo.js
26 ms
analytics.js
683 ms
gtm.js
763 ms
fbevents.js
667 ms
m-outer-1e02661a8587829bfa8aff26a17a6522.html
634 ms
bundle.js
679 ms
m-outer-945f047da5e8ad2631328de22d68a395.js
29 ms
home
104 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
119 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
119 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
106 ms
inner.html
111 ms
1570961003017001
94 ms
collect
27 ms
staging.glamhive.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
staging.glamhive.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
staging.glamhive.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Staging.glamhive.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Staging.glamhive.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
staging.glamhive.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Staging Glamhive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: