Tools & Wizards About Us
feed.haterhub.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

feed.haterhub.net

Page Load Speed

749 ms in total

First Response

271 ms

Resources Loaded

401 ms

Page Rendered

77 ms

feed.haterhub.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Feed Haterhub content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about feed.haterhub.net

Visit feed.haterhub.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Feed.haterhub.net page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 478 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

feed.haterhub.net performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

feed.haterhub.net

271 ms

iife.min.js

128 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Feed.haterhub.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (271 ms) belongs to the original domain Feed.haterhub.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 500 B (3%)

Content Size

15.4 kB

After Optimization

14.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Feed.haterhub.net main page is 15.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 14.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 488 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 565 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 488 B or 46% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 14.3 kB
  • After minification 14.3 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feed Haterhub. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

feed.haterhub.net

feed.haterhub.net

271 ms

iife.min.js

iife.min.js

128 ms

Accessibility Review

feed.haterhub.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

feed.haterhub.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

feed.haterhub.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feed.haterhub.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Feed.haterhub.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

feed.haterhub.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Feed Haterhub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: