Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

habitatlive.com

The domain name HabitatLive.com is for sale | Dan.com

Page Load Speed

20.5 sec in total

First Response

4.4 sec

Resources Loaded

15.7 sec

Page Rendered

470 ms

habitatlive.com screenshot

About Website

Visit habitatlive.com now to see the best up-to-date Habitat Live content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about habitatlive.com

The domain name HabitatLive.com is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.

Visit habitatlive.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Habitatlive.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.4 sec and then it took 16.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

habitatlive.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.051

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

habitatlive.com

4372 ms

style.css

562 ms

css

23 ms

font-awesome.min.css

513 ms

style.css

476 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Habitatlive.com, 28% (23 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 17% (14 requests) were made to I2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.5 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 660.8 kB (25%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Habitatlive.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 87.7 kB

  • Original 100.3 kB
  • After minification 91.0 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Habitat Live images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 250.4 kB

  • Original 443.8 kB
  • After minification 426.0 kB
  • After compression 193.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 250.4 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 320.6 kB

  • Original 366.2 kB
  • After minification 298.9 kB
  • After compression 45.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Habitatlive.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 320.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (33%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

51

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Habitat Live. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

habitatlive.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

habitatlive.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

habitatlive.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Habitatlive.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Habitatlive.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Habitat Live. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: