Tools & Wizards About Us
hacg.cc screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

hacg.cc

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

600 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

385 ms

hacg.cc screenshot

About Website

Welcome to hacg.cc homepage info - get ready to check Hacg best content for China right away, or after learning these important things about hacg.cc

好HHHHHHHHHHHH啊~这是一场来自二次元的战争！HACG梦A骑士团，集合！

Visit hacg.cc

Key Findings

We analyzed Hacg.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 600 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Hacg.cc rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

hacg.cc performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.hacg.cc

600 ms

sige.css

7 ms

16181860.js

1021 ms

jquery-1.4.min.js

67 ms

jquery.lazyload.js

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Hacg.cc, 3% (1 request) were made to Js.users.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Js.users.51.la.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 208.0 kB (67%)

Content Size

309.5 kB

After Optimization

101.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hacg.cc main page is 309.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 130.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 88.5 kB

  • Original 101.3 kB
  • After minification 91.7 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 49.5 kB
  • After minification 45.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hacg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 92.9 kB

  • Original 130.3 kB
  • After minification 111.6 kB
  • After compression 37.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 28.4 kB
  • After minification 23.0 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hacg.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (39%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hacg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.hacg.cc

www.hacg.cc

600 ms

sige.css

sige.css

7 ms

16181860.js

16181860.js

1021 ms

jquery-1.4.min.js

jquery-1.4.min.js

67 ms

jquery.lazyload.js

jquery.lazyload.js

5 ms

common.js

common.js

6 ms

dialog.js

dialog.js

6 ms

UpMenuDown.js

UpMenuDown.js

6 ms

updown.css

updown.css

8 ms

common.css

common.css

9 ms

topbar.png

topbar.png

4 ms

b1b.jpg

b1b.jpg

5 ms

banlogo.jpg

banlogo.jpg

6 ms

navA.png

navA.png

4 ms

searchA.png

searchA.png

6 ms

search_input.png

search_input.png

5 ms

search_btn.png

search_btn.png

7 ms

title_bg.gif

title_bg.gif

8 ms

sortnum.png

sortnum.png

7 ms

528_middle.gif

528_middle.gif

10 ms

1_middle.gif

1_middle.gif

9 ms

9496_middle.gif

9496_middle.gif

10 ms

avatar_m.gif

avatar_m.gif

11 ms

1934_middle.gif

1934_middle.gif

12 ms

5_middle.gif

5_middle.gif

14 ms

3239_middle.gif

3239_middle.gif

14 ms

icon.gif

icon.gif

16 ms

fire.gif

fire.gif

16 ms

new.gif

new.gif

16 ms

38 ms

up_arrow.png

up_arrow.png

4 ms

menu_icon.png

menu_icon.png

5 ms

down_arrow.png

down_arrow.png

4 ms

Accessibility Review

hacg.cc accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

hacg.cc best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

hacg.cc SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hacg.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Hacg.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hacg.cc

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hacg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: