Tools & Wizards About Us
hairmastic.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

hairmastic.net

LNMP一键安装包 by Licess

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

96 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

230 ms

hairmastic.net screenshot

About Website

Visit hairmastic.net now to see the best up-to-date Hairmastic content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hairmastic.net

您已成功安装LNMP一键安装包！

Visit hairmastic.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Hairmastic.net page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hairmastic.net performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.048

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hairmastic.net

96 ms

style.min.css

22 ms

css

25 ms

style.css

42 ms

custom.css

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Hairmastic.net, 10% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (100 ms) belongs to the original domain Hairmastic.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 65.7 kB (29%)

Content Size

227.4 kB

After Optimization

161.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hairmastic.net main page is 227.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 146.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 38.7 kB

  • Original 47.7 kB
  • After minification 43.8 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 17.4 kB

  • Original 146.3 kB
  • After minification 128.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hairmastic needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 728 B

  • Original 1.6 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB
  • After compression 912 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 728 B or 44% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 31.8 kB
  • After minification 31.7 kB
  • After compression 22.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hairmastic.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (25%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hairmastic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

hairmastic.net

hairmastic.net

96 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

22 ms

css

css

25 ms

style.css

style.css

42 ms

custom.css

custom.css

59 ms

default.css

default.css

59 ms

onejs

onejs

16 ms

selectnav.js

selectnav.js

66 ms

Living-Proof-Restore-Vs-Olaplex-200x140.png

Living-Proof-Restore-Vs-Olaplex-200x140.png

98 ms

Living-Proof-Perfect-Hair-Day-Vs-Restore-200x140.png

Living-Proof-Perfect-Hair-Day-Vs-Restore-200x140.png

98 ms

Living-Proof-Perfect-Hair-Day-Vs-Olaplex-200x140.png

Living-Proof-Perfect-Hair-Day-Vs-Olaplex-200x140.png

97 ms

Living-Proof-Perfect-Hair-Day-Vs-Full-200x140.png

Living-Proof-Perfect-Hair-Day-Vs-Full-200x140.png

98 ms

Olaplex-Vs-Living-Proof-No-Frizz-200x140.png

Olaplex-Vs-Living-Proof-No-Frizz-200x140.png

99 ms

Living-Proof-No-Frizz-Vs-Restore-200x140.png

Living-Proof-No-Frizz-Vs-Restore-200x140.png

98 ms

Living-Proof-No-Frizz-Vs-Perfect-Hair-Day-200x140.png

Living-Proof-No-Frizz-Vs-Perfect-Hair-Day-200x140.png

99 ms

5-Minoxidil-Vs-Rosemary-Oil-200x140.png

5-Minoxidil-Vs-Rosemary-Oil-200x140.png

99 ms

5-Minoxidil-Vs-2-Minoxidil-Hair-Growth-200x140.png

5-Minoxidil-Vs-2-Minoxidil-Hair-Growth-200x140.png

100 ms

Olaplex-No.0-Vs-Olaplex-No.8-200x140.png

Olaplex-No.0-Vs-Olaplex-No.8-200x140.png

100 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcQ7z.ttf

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcQ7z.ttf

23 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvmyI.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvmyI.ttf

30 ms

Accessibility Review

hairmastic.net accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

hairmastic.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

hairmastic.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hairmastic.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hairmastic.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hairmastic.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hairmastic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: