1.7 sec in total
154 ms
1.6 sec
0 ms
Click here to check amazing HairoXol content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hairoxol.com
Visit hairoxol.comWe analyzed Hairoxol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 154 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
hairoxol.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value7.3 s
4/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value1,440 ms
15/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.9 s
21/100
10%
154 ms
27 ms
112 ms
21 ms
123 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Hairoxol.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (166 ms) belongs to the original domain Hairoxol.com.
Page size can be reduced by 58.9 kB (6%)
1.0 MB
953.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Hairoxol.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 582.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. HairoXol images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (70%)
46
14
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HairoXol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
hairoxol.com
154 ms
breeze_72f3fdd27dcbd6f91d2e775622992a39.css
27 ms
css
112 ms
jquery.min.js
21 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
123 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
110 ms
js.cookie.min.js
110 ms
woocommerce.min.js
111 ms
flipclock.min.js
124 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
145 ms
order-attribution.min.js
144 ms
swiped-events.min.js
147 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
147 ms
effect.min.js
147 ms
ditty-news-ticker.js
151 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
152 ms
gtm4wp-ecommerce-generic.js
154 ms
gtm4wp-woocommerce.js
153 ms
cart_widget.min.js
153 ms
wc-gateway-ppec-order-review.js
154 ms
premium-wrapper-link.min.js
156 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
157 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
157 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
158 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
159 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
159 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
158 ms
hooks.min.js
158 ms
i18n.min.js
163 ms
frontend.min.js
161 ms
waypoints.min.js
161 ms
core.min.js
162 ms
frontend.min.js
166 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
165 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
166 ms
gtm.js
108 ms
logo.png
54 ms
12565bf4219cdd9b74734ed646c75549.png
55 ms
bg.jpg
53 ms
top-btl.png
59 ms
nahren.jpg
54 ms
starken.jpg
59 ms
regen.jpg
79 ms
bg2.jpg
65 ms
hairoxol-chart.jpg
68 ms
bg3.jpg
65 ms
bg4.jpg
69 ms
hairoxol.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
hairoxol.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
hairoxol.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hairoxol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hairoxol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hairoxol.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of HairoXol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: