Tools & Wizards About Us
hairremoval.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

hairremoval.com

Laser Hair Removal | Your Source For All Your Hair Removal Needs

Page Load Speed

448 ms in total

First Response

34 ms

Resources Loaded

240 ms

Page Rendered

174 ms

hairremoval.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to hairremoval.com homepage info - get ready to check Hair Removal best content right away, or after learning these important things about hairremoval.com

HairRemoval.com Provides Information on Laser Hair Removal, and Other Popular Types of Hair Removal. We Will Help Connect You To A Provider In Your Area!

Visit hairremoval.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hairremoval.com page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 414 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hairremoval.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

58/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hairremoval.com

34 ms

www.hairremoval.com

62 ms

styles.css

4 ms

show_ads.js

39 ms

ga.js

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Hairremoval.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (92 ms) belongs to the original domain Hairremoval.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 125.3 kB (38%)

Content Size

333.2 kB

After Optimization

207.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hairremoval.com main page is 333.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 133.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 63.8 kB

  • Original 71.2 kB
  • After minification 48.8 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.4 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 133.6 kB
  • After minification 101.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hair Removal needs image optimization as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 29.2 kB

  • Original 126.9 kB
  • After minification 126.9 kB
  • After compression 97.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 29.2 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 312 B

  • Original 1.5 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hairremoval.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 312 B or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hair Removal. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

hairremoval.com

hairremoval.com

34 ms

www.hairremoval.com

www.hairremoval.com

62 ms

styles.css

styles.css

4 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

39 ms

ga.js

ga.js

16 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

20 ms

layout_r2_c2.jpg

layout_r2_c2.jpg

20 ms

layout_r2_c5.jpg

layout_r2_c5.jpg

33 ms

layout_r29_c2.jpg

layout_r29_c2.jpg

33 ms

layout_r3_c2.jpg

layout_r3_c2.jpg

20 ms

layout_r19_c2.jpg

layout_r19_c2.jpg

33 ms

layout_r11_c3.jpg

layout_r11_c3.jpg

34 ms

layout_r11_c4.jpg

layout_r11_c4.jpg

34 ms

layout_r12_c6.jpg

layout_r12_c6.jpg

36 ms

woman.jpg

woman.jpg

35 ms

vmsmall-logo.png

vmsmall-logo.png

35 ms

xhtml10gold.jpg

xhtml10gold.jpg

36 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

19 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

47 ms

lazer-layout_r20_c3_top_index.jpg

lazer-layout_r20_c3_top_index.jpg

91 ms

lazer-layout_r20_c3_middle.jpg

lazer-layout_r20_c3_middle.jpg

92 ms

layout_r20_c3_bottom.jpg

layout_r20_c3_bottom.jpg

5 ms

Accessibility Review

hairremoval.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

hairremoval.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

hairremoval.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hairremoval.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Hairremoval.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hairremoval.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hair Removal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: