3.1 sec in total
311 ms
2.7 sec
93 ms
Visit ham.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date HAM content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ham.co.uk
Human factors, ergonomics design & usability UK consultancy, focused on improving organisational performance, reducing operational risks and costs.
Visit ham.co.ukWe analyzed Ham.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 311 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
ham.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.8 s
79/100
10%
311 ms
418 ms
9 ms
19 ms
4 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Ham.co.uk, 7% (3 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Ham.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 207.1 kB (10%)
2.0 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Ham.co.uk main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 182.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. HAM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (10%)
40
36
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HAM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ham.co.uk
311 ms
www.ham.co.uk
418 ms
prototype.js
9 ms
scriptaculous.js
19 ms
effects.js
4 ms
analytics.js
9 ms
index3c.gif
245 ms
_clear.gif
170 ms
ems3i.jpeg
627 ms
avonandsomersetl3.jpeg
173 ms
userspublicdocum3.jpeg
176 ms
firebrigadesunio3.jpeg
175 ms
train3.jpeg
407 ms
petroplant3.jpeg
418 ms
westmidlandspoli3.jpeg
339 ms
severntrent2c.jpeg
340 ms
interfleettechno3.jpeg
406 ms
ykh8gx3c3.jpeg
494 ms
anglianled200c.gif
574 ms
associatedbritis3.jpeg
559 ms
hampshirefire0c.jpeg
568 ms
glospolicelogo3.jpeg
582 ms
nhsdirect3.jpeg
654 ms
index9b.gif
723 ms
hamlogo2011large4.gif
729 ms
item5b.gif
726 ms
crest3.jpeg
746 ms
northernirelendf3.jpeg
790 ms
hpalogoonlyv5c.jpeg
814 ms
dyfedpowys3.jpeg
877 ms
bedfordshirebadge3.gif
959 ms
devonsomersetfire3.gif
972 ms
index2d.jpeg
1137 ms
img6975i.jpeg
1697 ms
plan17.jpeg
1773 ms
img0610d.jpeg
1197 ms
img6912bw4.jpeg
1681 ms
sta0050a4.jpeg
1301 ms
m14i.gif
1296 ms
collect
25 ms
js
57 ms
m14h.gif
163 ms
ham.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ham.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ham.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ham.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ham.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ham.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of HAM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: