Tools & Wizards About Us
hammashelina.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

hammashelina.com

Etusivu | Hammaslääkäri Helinä Mäkilä Heinola 18100

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

854 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

58 ms

hammashelina.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hammashelina content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hammashelina.com

Hammaslääkäri Helinä Mäkilä Ky on Heinolassa toimiva, eri ketjuista riippumaton hampaiden ja suun terveyden ylläpitoon keskittyvä yritys. Palveluihimme kuuluvat muun muassa hampaiden poisto, juurihoit...

Visit hammashelina.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hammashelina.com page load time and found that the first response time was 854 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hammashelina.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.hammashelina.com

854 ms

minified.js

25 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

61 ms

polyfill.min.js

62 ms

f9db93_c446193bfe0e4280b9a3570083d95897~mv2.png

264 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hammashelina.com, 42% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 39% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (854 ms) belongs to the original domain Hammashelina.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 319.1 kB (48%)

Content Size

668.9 kB

After Optimization

349.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Hammashelina.com main page is 668.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 363.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 270.2 kB

  • Original 363.2 kB
  • After minification 361.6 kB
  • After compression 93.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 270.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 741 B

  • Original 8.0 kB
  • After minification 7.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hammashelina images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 297.7 kB
  • After minification 297.7 kB
  • After compression 249.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (61%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hammashelina. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.hammashelina.com

www.hammashelina.com

854 ms

minified.js

minified.js

25 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

61 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

62 ms

f9db93_c446193bfe0e4280b9a3570083d95897~mv2.png

f9db93_c446193bfe0e4280b9a3570083d95897~mv2.png

264 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

28 ms

f9db93_cd4c0dba599f47d2bc4fa7a44b0f64db~mv2_d_5280_3164_s_4_2.jpg

f9db93_cd4c0dba599f47d2bc4fa7a44b0f64db~mv2_d_5280_3164_s_4_2.jpg

364 ms

thunderbolt-commons.4a294b38.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.4a294b38.bundle.min.js

16 ms

main.c07e8381.bundle.min.js

main.c07e8381.bundle.min.js

16 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

78 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

65 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

19 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

64 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

71 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

70 ms

146 ms

142 ms

138 ms

140 ms

138 ms

137 ms

154 ms

155 ms

155 ms

154 ms

135 ms

128 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

26 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

6 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

7 ms

Accessibility Review

hammashelina.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

hammashelina.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

hammashelina.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FI

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hammashelina.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Finnish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Hammashelina.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hammashelina.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hammashelina. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: