Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com

Hampton Inn and Suites Myrtle Beach Oceanfront Hotel

Page Load Speed

547 ms in total

First Response

44 ms

Resources Loaded

427 ms

Page Rendered

76 ms

hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com screenshot

About Website

Visit hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com now to see the best up-to-date Hampton Inn Myrtle Beach content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com

The Hampton Inn and Suites Myrtle Beach Oceanfront hotel near Market Common, is located on the beach and offers nine pools and free WiFi.

Visit hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com page load time and found that the first response time was 44 ms and then it took 503 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,470 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.156

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value32.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com

44 ms

myrtlebeachoceanfrontsuites.hamptoninn.com

139 ms

65 ms

ruxitagent_ICASVfhu_10181191119154660.js

25 ms

launch-EN02272261e0b845508227acf3ca0c37de.min.js

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com, 27% (3 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com and 27% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.hilton.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (139 ms) relates to the external source Myrtlebeachoceanfrontsuites.hamptoninn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 617.6 kB (74%)

Content Size

834.1 kB

After Optimization

216.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com main page is 834.1 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 715.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 66.1 kB

  • Original 118.4 kB
  • After minification 114.8 kB
  • After compression 52.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.1 kB or 56% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 551.5 kB

  • Original 715.8 kB
  • After minification 715.8 kB
  • After compression 164.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 551.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hampton Inn Myrtle Beach. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Hamptoninnmyrtlebeach.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hampton Inn Myrtle Beach. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: