3.6 sec in total
497 ms
2.9 sec
262 ms
Visit harefieldplace.com now to see the best up-to-date Harefield Place content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about harefieldplace.com
Visit harefieldplace.comWe analyzed Harefieldplace.com page load time and found that the first response time was 497 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
harefieldplace.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
7/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value13.6 s
2/100
10%
Value1,940 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value17.5 s
4/100
10%
497 ms
275 ms
384 ms
333 ms
317 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Harefieldplace.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Harefieldplace.com.
Page size can be reduced by 97.0 kB (14%)
697.9 kB
600.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Harefieldplace.com main page is 697.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 339.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Harefield Place images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Harefieldplace.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (73%)
75
20
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Harefield Place. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.harefieldplace.com
497 ms
fonts.css
275 ms
dashicons.min.css
384 ms
shortcodes.css
333 ms
styles.css
317 ms
style.min.css
471 ms
font-awesome.min.css
351 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
389 ms
js_composer.min.css
603 ms
bootstrap.min.css
442 ms
base.min.css
552 ms
style.min.css
481 ms
other.min.css
503 ms
style.css
542 ms
custom-skin.css
572 ms
style.css
589 ms
css2
37 ms
css2
220 ms
jquery.min.js
633 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
644 ms
cookie-list.js
659 ms
shortcode-block-cookie.js
681 ms
js
67 ms
css
25 ms
lightbox.min.css
666 ms
owl.min.css
667 ms
animate.min.css
667 ms
linea-iconfont-admin.css
732 ms
all.min.css
732 ms
rs6.css
795 ms
cookie-popup.js
808 ms
jquery.base64.min.js
807 ms
index.js
807 ms
index.js
844 ms
rbtools.min.js
929 ms
rs6.min.js
1135 ms
api.js
30 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
928 ms
index.js
928 ms
gsap.min.js
927 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
962 ms
ScrollMagic.min.js
895 ms
animation.gsap.min.js
817 ms
sticky-header.min.js
797 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
801 ms
lightbox.min.js
802 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
792 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
798 ms
underscore.min.js
770 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
752 ms
vc_grid.min.js
772 ms
main.min.js
865 ms
Harefield-Place_logo_white_mobile-x2_500x248px.png
594 ms
dummy.png
617 ms
title-separator-300x9.png
636 ms
Harefield-Place_pool-gym-ickenham-house-1024x658.jpg
870 ms
harefield-show-home-int-43-HDR-ickenham-house-1024x683.jpg
913 ms
DSC01863-ickenham-house-1024x659.jpg
828 ms
block-all.svg
756 ms
essential.svg
761 ms
functionality.svg
777 ms
statistics.svg
817 ms
targeting.svg
819 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1E1yyccg.ttf
66 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EiSyccg.ttf
65 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1Euyyccg.ttf
127 ms
7r3DqXNgp8wxdOdOlyAK_a4.ttf
162 ms
7r3GqXNgp8wxdOdOr4w.ttf
152 ms
linea.woff
819 ms
www.harefieldplace.com
798 ms
flaticon.woff
850 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
938 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
805 ms
recaptcha__en.js
26 ms
anchor
63 ms
prev.png
244 ms
next.png
245 ms
loading.gif
271 ms
close.png
276 ms
styles__ltr.css
20 ms
recaptcha__en.js
23 ms
Fwsk0FxTZqr0hLD4ykHS8t2KX_Rc-f1kNJnL8m1IMFM.js
58 ms
webworker.js
58 ms
logo_48.png
44 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
12 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
12 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
11 ms
recaptcha__en.js
61 ms
harefieldplace.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
harefieldplace.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
harefieldplace.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Harefieldplace.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Harefieldplace.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
harefieldplace.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Harefield Place. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: