2.7 sec in total
567 ms
2 sec
149 ms
Welcome to harekrishnablog.com homepage info - get ready to check Harekrishnablog best content right away, or after learning these important things about harekrishnablog.com
Visit harekrishnablog.comWe analyzed Harekrishnablog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 567 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
harekrishnablog.com performance score
567 ms
147 ms
97 ms
137 ms
305 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Harekrishnablog.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (589 ms) belongs to the original domain Harekrishnablog.com.
Page size can be reduced by 920.2 kB (73%)
1.3 MB
345.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Harekrishnablog.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 607.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Harekrishnablog needs image optimization as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 345.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 345.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 517.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Harekrishnablog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 517.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (60%)
48
19
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Harekrishnablog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.harekrishnablog.com
567 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
147 ms
aqpb-view.css
97 ms
font-awesome.min.css
137 ms
gumby.css
305 ms
owl.carousel.css
94 ms
owl.theme.css
176 ms
style.css
362 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
232 ms
responsive.css
268 ms
custom_style.php
448 ms
jquery.js
396 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
327 ms
post-like.js
329 ms
aqpb-view.js
365 ms
marquee.js
388 ms
superfish.js
414 ms
owl.carousel.js
542 ms
jquery.pageslide.min.js
455 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
589 ms
fluidvids.js
547 ms
jquery.sticky.js
548 ms
waypoints.min.js
548 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
550 ms
custom.js
572 ms
wp-embed.min.js
572 ms
css
25 ms
css
38 ms
border.png
264 ms
button_search.gif
264 ms
clock.png
263 ms
dark-arrow.svg
264 ms
facebook.png
265 ms
google-plus.png
265 ms
youtube.png
266 ms
twitter.png
264 ms
Shri-Chanchalapathi-Dasa-meets-HH-the-Dalai-Lama-20.jpg
279 ms
pa-bgs1_large-1.jpg
286 ms
stock-video-3932132-tree-and-sun-moon-02-background-1.jpg
265 ms
Rupa-Goswami-1.jpg
303 ms
Rupa-Goswami-1-75x75.jpg
282 ms
stock-video-3932132-tree-and-sun-moon-02-background-1-75x75.jpg
290 ms
pa-bgs1_large-1-75x75.jpg
365 ms
Shri-Chanchalapathi-Dasa-meets-HH-the-Dalai-Lama-20-75x75.jpg
374 ms
dot.png
381 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
6 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf
12 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
477 ms
5yu8QPXaZZc
42 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
24 ms
www-embed-player.js
45 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
40 ms
ad_status.js
31 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
28 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
30 ms
harekrishnablog.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Harekrishnablog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Harekrishnablog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
harekrishnablog.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Harekrishnablog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: