Tools & Wizards About Us
harpersigns.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

harpersigns.co.uk

Home - Harper Signs

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

747 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

903 ms

harpersigns.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Harper Signs content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about harpersigns.co.uk

Visit harpersigns.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Harpersigns.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 747 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

harpersigns.co.uk performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.6 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value540 ms

54/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.6 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

harpersigns.co.uk

747 ms

style.min.css

96 ms

ef0c9903fdb656653ceeeccaf0744a36.min.css

381 ms

jquery.min.js

272 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

275 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Harpersigns.co.uk, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (829 ms) belongs to the original domain Harpersigns.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 327.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

6.3 MB

After Optimization

5.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Harpersigns.co.uk main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 196.7 kB

  • Original 227.0 kB
  • After minification 222.9 kB
  • After compression 30.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 196.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 127.0 kB

  • Original 5.3 MB
  • After minification 5.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Harper Signs images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 84 B

  • Original 546.9 kB
  • After minification 546.9 kB
  • After compression 546.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 177.7 kB
  • After minification 177.7 kB
  • After compression 173.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Harpersigns.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (29%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

32

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Harper Signs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

harpersigns.co.uk

harpersigns.co.uk

747 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

96 ms

ef0c9903fdb656653ceeeccaf0744a36.min.css

ef0c9903fdb656653ceeeccaf0744a36.min.css

381 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

272 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

275 ms

css

css

32 ms

revolution.addon.thecluster.css

revolution.addon.thecluster.css

275 ms

revolution.addon.transitionpack.css

revolution.addon.transitionpack.css

274 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

290 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

532 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

534 ms

revolution.addon.mousetrap.min.js

revolution.addon.mousetrap.min.js

367 ms

revolution.addon.thecluster.min.js

revolution.addon.thecluster.min.js

532 ms

three.min.js

three.min.js

607 ms

revolution.addon.transitionpack.min.js

revolution.addon.transitionpack.min.js

532 ms

0f623467798711c4eb7c2e0e2216500e.min.js

0f623467798711c4eb7c2e0e2216500e.min.js

607 ms

logo_white.png

logo_white.png

180 ms

TGI-2.png

TGI-2.png

96 ms

beaverbrooks-1.png

beaverbrooks-1.png

138 ms

tag-1.png

tag-1.png

96 ms

newlook.png

newlook.png

201 ms

turtlebay-1.png

turtlebay-1.png

200 ms

pizzapunks-1.png

pizzapunks-1.png

201 ms

oxford-street-1.jpg

oxford-street-1.jpg

468 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

261 ms

logo-1.png

logo-1.png

275 ms

64.png

64.png

301 ms

design.jpg

design.jpg

639 ms

manufacture.jpg

manufacture.jpg

371 ms

installation.jpg

installation.jpg

547 ms

edinburgh1.jpg

edinburgh1.jpg

444 ms

newlook.jpg

newlook.jpg

554 ms

beaverbrooks.jpg

beaverbrooks.jpg

553 ms

tag.jpg

tag.jpg

623 ms

magnet.jpg

magnet.jpg

746 ms

giraffee.jpg

giraffee.jpg

741 ms

beaverbrooks.png

beaverbrooks.png

645 ms

burgerking.png

burgerking.png

647 ms

giraffe.png

giraffe.png

714 ms

kingdom.png

kingdom.png

729 ms

newloog.png

newloog.png

737 ms

pizzapunks.png

pizzapunks.png

739 ms

tag.png

tag.png

803 ms

TGI.png

TGI.png

823 ms

thealchemist.png

thealchemist.png

829 ms

turtlebay.png

turtlebay.png

774 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

774 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

786 ms

awb-icons.woff

awb-icons.woff

760 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

59 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

83 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfFunDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfFunDXbtY.ttf

123 ms

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk79FN_C-bw.ttf

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk79FN_C-bw.ttf

96 ms

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59E9_C-bw.ttf

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59E9_C-bw.ttf

95 ms

Accessibility Review

harpersigns.co.uk accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

harpersigns.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

harpersigns.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Harpersigns.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Harpersigns.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

harpersigns.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Harper Signs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: