Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

hashstream.in

Web Design Jaipur, Web Development Jaipur, SEO Company Jaipur, Hashstream technology jaipur India

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

565 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

191 ms

hashstream.in screenshot

About Website

Visit hashstream.in now to see the best up-to-date Hashstream content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hashstream.in

Hashstream technology offers SEO friendly web designing & web development services, and SEO services in Jaipur and Delhi at reasonable price. We also provide customized development solutions.

Visit hashstream.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Hashstream.in page load time and found that the first response time was 565 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hashstream.in performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,080 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.93

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.1 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hashstream.in

565 ms

css

23 ms

style.css

236 ms

settings.css

254 ms

grayblue.css

260 ms

Our browser made a total of 122 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Hashstream.in, 16% (20 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 12% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (929 ms) belongs to the original domain Hashstream.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 598.1 kB (36%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Hashstream.in main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 726.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 726.0 kB
  • After minification 712.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hashstream images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 322.6 kB

  • Original 633.8 kB
  • After minification 607.5 kB
  • After compression 311.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 322.6 kB or 51% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 262.2 kB

  • Original 303.3 kB
  • After minification 232.5 kB
  • After compression 41.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hashstream.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 262.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (63%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hashstream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

hashstream.in accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

hashstream.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

hashstream.in SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hashstream.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Hashstream.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hashstream. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: