Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

254 ms

Resources Loaded

791 ms

Page Rendered

224 ms

hateweight.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to hateweight.com homepage info - get ready to check Hateweight best content right away, or after learning these important things about hateweight.com

Hoodia Diet Pills, Fast Weight Loss – Fight obesity Fitness exercises, diets, weight loss tips, supplements, articles, weight loss pills, products and fitness tools

Visit hateweight.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hateweight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 254 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hateweight.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value890 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hateweight.com

254 ms

hateweight.css

53 ms

show_ads.js

7 ms

ua.js

102 ms

ftiens4.js

177 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Hateweight.com, 11% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (279 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 115.4 kB (49%)

Content Size

233.6 kB

After Optimization

118.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Hateweight.com main page is 233.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 81.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 71.2 kB

  • Original 81.2 kB
  • After minification 74.8 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.2 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 69.1 kB
  • After minification 67.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hateweight images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 39.1 kB

  • Original 79.4 kB
  • After minification 63.8 kB
  • After compression 40.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 39.1 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 4.0 kB
  • After minification 3.2 kB
  • After compression 575 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hateweight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (56%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hateweight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

hateweight.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

hateweight.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

hateweight.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hateweight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Hateweight.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hateweight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: