Tools & Wizards About Us
haystar.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

haystar.in

Buy Domestic Atta Chakki Machine - Best Flour Mill Machine

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

58 ms

Resources Loaded

467 ms

Page Rendered

602 ms

haystar.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Haystar content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about haystar.in

Haystar - Buy attachakki online, domestic flour mill, domestic atta chakki machine, gharghanti for home, attachakki for home, atta chakki manufacturers, gharghanti price india, attachakki machine for ...

Visit haystar.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Haystar.in page load time and found that the first response time was 58 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

haystar.in performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.068

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

haystar.in

58 ms

qt=q:95

134 ms

script.js

55 ms

UX.4.37.7.js

30 ms

script.js

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Haystar.in, 75% (18 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (355 ms) relates to the external source Img1.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 746.9 kB (55%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

600.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Haystar.in main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 110.7 kB

  • Original 135.0 kB
  • After minification 135.0 kB
  • After compression 24.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 195.6 kB
  • After minification 195.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Haystar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 636.3 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 380.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 636.3 kB or 63% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (35%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Haystar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

haystar.in

haystar.in

58 ms

qt=q:95

qt=q:95

134 ms

script.js

script.js

55 ms

UX.4.37.7.js

UX.4.37.7.js

30 ms

script.js

script.js

67 ms

js

js

65 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

62 ms

rs=h:500,cg:true

rs=h:500,cg:true

193 ms

rs=h:100,cg:true

rs=h:100,cg:true

116 ms

rs=h:100,cg:true,m

rs=h:100,cg:true,m

115 ms

rs=h:100,cg:true,m

rs=h:100,cg:true,m

165 ms

rs=h:100,cg:true,m

rs=h:100,cg:true,m

134 ms

rs=h:100,cg:true,m

rs=h:100,cg:true,m

161 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

355 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

116 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff

123 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

130 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

131 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff

131 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

123 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

108 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

27 ms

ads

ads

38 ms

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkbqDH7alwQ.woff

u-4X0qWljRw-PfU81xCKCpdpbgZJl6XFpfEd7eA9BIxxkbqDH7alwQ.woff

5 ms

Accessibility Review

haystar.in accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

haystar.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

haystar.in SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Haystar.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Haystar.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

haystar.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Haystar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: