Tools & Wizards About Us
healthfinding.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

healthfinding.com

HealthFinding - HealthFinding Information & Knowledge.

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

140 ms

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

healthfinding.com screenshot

About Website

Visit healthfinding.com now to see the best up-to-date Health Finding content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about healthfinding.com

News,Business,Autos,Culture,Music,Relationships,Health,Garden,Insurance,Law,Pets,Tech,Travel

Visit healthfinding.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Healthfinding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

healthfinding.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value790 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.095

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

healthfinding.com

140 ms

www.healthfinding.com

735 ms

style.min.css

531 ms

bs-icons.css

505 ms

style.min.css

510 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Healthfinding.com, 83% (44 requests) were made to Cdnus.oss-us-west-1.aliyuncs.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Cdnus.oss-us-west-1.aliyuncs.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (75%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

519.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Healthfinding.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 241.2 kB

  • Original 264.7 kB
  • After minification 221.2 kB
  • After compression 23.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 43.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 241.2 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 262.8 kB
  • After minification 256.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Health Finding images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 143.0 kB

  • Original 206.9 kB
  • After minification 202.7 kB
  • After compression 63.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 143.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 176.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Healthfinding.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (65%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Health Finding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

healthfinding.com

healthfinding.com

140 ms

www.healthfinding.com

www.healthfinding.com

735 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

531 ms

bs-icons.css

bs-icons.css

505 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

510 ms

styles.css

styles.css

528 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

506 ms

blockquote-pack.min.css

blockquote-pack.min.css

536 ms

newsletter-pack.min.css

newsletter-pack.min.css

625 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

900 ms

pretty-photo.min.css

pretty-photo.min.css

604 ms

theme-libs.min.css

theme-libs.min.css

866 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

628 ms

style-7.5.2.min.css

style-7.5.2.min.css

1185 ms

css

css

86 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

701 ms

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

954 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

718 ms

fcd2bdbd6b4046750892afc09c7f38ff.css

fcd2bdbd6b4046750892afc09c7f38ff.css

952 ms

style.css

style.css

251 ms

element-query.min.js

element-query.min.js

708 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

840 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

847 ms

blazy.min.js

blazy.min.js

863 ms

bs-ajax-pagination.min.js

bs-ajax-pagination.min.js

881 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

936 ms

theme-libs.min.js

theme-libs.min.js

1663 ms

pretty-photo.min.js

pretty-photo.min.js

946 ms

theme.min.js

theme.min.js

1035 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

996 ms

advertising.min.js

advertising.min.js

1007 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1054 ms

timeshow.js

timeshow.js

1660 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

118 ms

mem8YaGs126MiZpBA-UFVZ0ef8pkAg.ttf

mem8YaGs126MiZpBA-UFVZ0ef8pkAg.ttf

35 ms

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UNirkOUuhsKKSTjw.ttf

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UNirkOUuhsKKSTjw.ttf

113 ms

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN7rgOUuhsKKSTjw.ttf

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN7rgOUuhsKKSTjw.ttf

179 ms

bs-icons.woff

bs-icons.woff

422 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1449 ms

027_569x259.jpg

027_569x259.jpg

409 ms

analytics.min.js

analytics.min.js

878 ms

090_569x259.jpg

090_569x259.jpg

226 ms

031_569x259.jpg

031_569x259.jpg

323 ms

093_569x259.jpg

093_569x259.jpg

214 ms

089_569x259.jpg

089_569x259.jpg

211 ms

007_569x259.jpg

007_569x259.jpg

302 ms

013_400x266.jpg

013_400x266.jpg

320 ms

022_400x266.jpg

022_400x266.jpg

306 ms

017_300x200.jpg

017_300x200.jpg

307 ms

094_300x200.jpg

094_300x200.jpg

303 ms

086_300x200.jpg

086_300x200.jpg

305 ms

021_357x210.jpg

021_357x210.jpg

305 ms

016_357x210.jpg

016_357x210.jpg

307 ms

Accessibility Review

healthfinding.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

healthfinding.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

healthfinding.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Healthfinding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Healthfinding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

healthfinding.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Health Finding. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: