Tools & Wizards About Us
healthtrackertool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 57

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

healthtrackertool.com

Page Load Speed

10.9 sec in total

First Response

3 sec

Resources Loaded

7.8 sec

Page Rendered

150 ms

healthtrackertool.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to healthtrackertool.com homepage info - get ready to check Healthtrackertool best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about healthtrackertool.com

Visit healthtrackertool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Healthtrackertool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

healthtrackertool.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,300 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

healthtrackertool.com

2969 ms

healthtrackertool.com

2913 ms

style.css

280 ms

responsive.css

253 ms

cubepm.css

306 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Healthtrackertool.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Healthtrackertool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 290.8 kB (37%)

Content Size

793.4 kB

After Optimization

502.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Healthtrackertool.com main page is 793.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 451.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 15.5 kB
  • After minification 14.2 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 40.6 kB

  • Original 451.4 kB
  • After minification 410.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Healthtrackertool images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 161.8 kB

  • Original 235.3 kB
  • After minification 222.9 kB
  • After compression 73.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 161.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 77.0 kB

  • Original 91.2 kB
  • After minification 73.3 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Healthtrackertool.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (62%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Healthtrackertool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

healthtrackertool.com

healthtrackertool.com

2969 ms

healthtrackertool.com

healthtrackertool.com

2913 ms

style.css

style.css

280 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

253 ms

cubepm.css

cubepm.css

306 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

362 ms

jquery.autocomplete.pack.js

jquery.autocomplete.pack.js

305 ms

cubepm.js

cubepm.js

304 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

461 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

473 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

582 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

509 ms

selectivizr.js

selectivizr.js

525 ms

mediaqueries.js

mediaqueries.js

560 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

654 ms

jquery.mobilemenu.js

jquery.mobilemenu.js

663 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

701 ms

jquery.touchwipe.min.js

jquery.touchwipe.min.js

725 ms

jquery.jcarousel.js

jquery.jcarousel.js

764 ms

slider.js

slider.js

784 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

844 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

854 ms

css

css

22 ms

reset.css

reset.css

617 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

641 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

680 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

130 ms

backgroundTile.png

backgroundTile.png

100 ms

picons01.png

picons01.png

162 ms

picons02.png

picons02.png

242 ms

picons06.png

picons06.png

230 ms

shadow-top.png

shadow-top.png

240 ms

homepage-01.png

homepage-01.png

425 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

317 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

365 ms

top.png

top.png

432 ms

backgroundTile.png

backgroundTile.png

559 ms

vasa-cw-dark.png

vasa-cw-dark.png

297 ms

slider1.png

slider1.png

731 ms

vasa-cw-light.png

vasa-cw-light.png

408 ms

Accessibility Review

healthtrackertool.com accessibility score

57

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

healthtrackertool.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

healthtrackertool.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Healthtrackertool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Healthtrackertool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

healthtrackertool.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Healthtrackertool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: