Tools & Wizards About Us
hearingreviews.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

hearingreviews.com

Hearing Reviews - Hearing Aids for Better Hearing Health

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

45 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

106 ms

hearingreviews.com screenshot

About Website

Visit hearingreviews.com now to see the best up-to-date Hearing Reviews content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hearingreviews.com

We offer clear, honest & independent advice on hearing aids and other products to help your hearing health

Visit hearingreviews.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hearingreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hearingreviews.com performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

83/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.8 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hearingreviews.com

45 ms

hearingreviews.com

343 ms

style.min.css

15 ms

classic-themes.min.css

32 ms

oxygen.css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Hearingreviews.com, 45% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (343 ms) belongs to the original domain Hearingreviews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 39.8 kB (38%)

Content Size

105.8 kB

After Optimization

66.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Hearingreviews.com main page is 105.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 49.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 38.5 kB

  • Original 49.4 kB
  • After minification 49.0 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 29.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 26.7 kB
  • After minification 26.7 kB
  • After compression 25.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hearingreviews.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (67%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hearing Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

hearingreviews.com

hearingreviews.com

45 ms

hearingreviews.com

hearingreviews.com

343 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

15 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

32 ms

oxygen.css

oxygen.css

28 ms

main-4744.css

main-4744.css

30 ms

home-4369.css

home-4369.css

43 ms

universal.css

universal.css

32 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

18 ms

HR_Logo_450-2.png

HR_Logo_450-2.png

40 ms

css

css

37 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

20 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

33 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

46 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

50 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

57 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

56 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

55 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

56 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

57 ms

Accessibility Review

hearingreviews.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

hearingreviews.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

hearingreviews.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hearingreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hearingreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

hearingreviews.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Hearing Reviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: