Tools & Wizards About Us
heart.digital screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

heart.digital

Web Design & Digital Marketing For Small Businesses - Heart Digital

Page Load Speed

16.6 sec in total

First Response

7 sec

Resources Loaded

9.3 sec

Page Rendered

320 ms

heart.digital screenshot

About Website

Visit heart.digital now to see the best up-to-date Heart content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about heart.digital

Heart Digital Ltd provides digital marketing services to small businesses, including web design, social media marketing, email marketing, PPC and SEO.

Visit heart.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Heart.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 7 sec and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

heart.digital performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.096

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

heart.digital

7039 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

390 ms

ctf-styles.min.css

363 ms

front.min.css

381 ms

js

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Heart.digital, 61% (30 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7 sec) belongs to the original domain Heart.digital.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 246.4 kB (8%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Heart.digital main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 143.2 kB

  • Original 170.3 kB
  • After minification 169.1 kB
  • After compression 27.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 73.0 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Heart images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 25.6 kB

  • Original 134.4 kB
  • After minification 131.0 kB
  • After compression 108.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 22.4 kB
  • After minification 22.4 kB
  • After compression 17.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Heart.digital needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (59%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Heart. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

heart.digital

heart.digital

7039 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

sbi-styles.min.css

390 ms

ctf-styles.min.css

ctf-styles.min.css

363 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

381 ms

js

js

66 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

488 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

348 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

577 ms

hashchange.js

hashchange.js

673 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

680 ms

wp-slimstat.min.js

wp-slimstat.min.js

21 ms

common.js

common.js

707 ms

black-heart-digital-logo.png

black-heart-digital-logo.png

637 ms

logo-workspace-web.jpg

logo-workspace-web.jpg

839 ms

heartscreen-web.jpg

heartscreen-web.jpg

899 ms

transparent-heart-only-smaller-150x150.png

transparent-heart-only-smaller-150x150.png

682 ms

gold-spots-divider-slim-web.jpg

gold-spots-divider-slim-web.jpg

924 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCM.woff

41 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCP.ttf

37 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCM.woff

41 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCP.ttf

41 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEooCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEooCM.woff

40 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEooCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEooCP.ttf

41 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaooCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaooCM.woff

65 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaooCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaooCP.ttf

65 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao4CM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao4CM.woff

66 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao4CP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao4CP.ttf

66 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCM.woff

66 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCP.ttf

67 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCM.woff

70 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCP.ttf

68 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCM.woff

69 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCP.ttf

69 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpYCM.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpYCM.woff

69 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpYCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpYCP.ttf

70 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAA.woff

71 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

71 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAA.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAA.woff

74 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

74 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAA.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAA.woff

73 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

73 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5g.woff

109 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

113 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAA.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAA.woff

110 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

109 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxM.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxM.woff

111 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxP.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxP.ttf

111 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

689 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

456 ms

Accessibility Review

heart.digital accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

heart.digital best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

heart.digital SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Heart.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Heart.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

heart.digital

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Heart. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: