1.9 sec in total
66 ms
1.1 sec
696 ms
Click here to check amazing HEARTLINE content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about heartline.com
The HEARTLINE Study from Johnson & Johnson in collaboration with Apple will analyze the impact of Apple Watch on AFib diagnosis and the prevention of stroke.
Visit heartline.comWe analyzed Heartline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
heartline.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
83/100
10%
Value4.9 s
29/100
25%
Value2.8 s
95/100
10%
Value710 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.132
81/100
15%
Value6.5 s
59/100
10%
66 ms
112 ms
33 ms
46 ms
64 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Heartline.com, 45% (14 requests) were made to Assets.prod.heartline.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (480 ms) belongs to the original domain Heartline.com.
Page size can be reduced by 304.6 kB (11%)
2.8 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Heartline.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 289.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, HEARTLINE needs image optimization as it can save up to 289.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 64 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Heartline.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (16%)
25
21
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of HEARTLINE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
heartline.com
66 ms
heartline.com
112 ms
css
33 ms
css
46 ms
main.bb18a926.js
64 ms
main.f866af6e.css
480 ms
analytics.js
318 ms
fbevents.js
281 ms
heartline-logo.jpg
391 ms
lookup
184 ms
badge-enrollment-closed-108w@2x.png
179 ms
get-the-app-50w@2x.png
187 ms
j-j-logosignature-rgb-red.png
215 ms
technology-280w@2x.png
188 ms
02-Study-Phones-01-270x530@2x.png
218 ms
02-Study-Phones-02-270x530@2x.png
238 ms
02-Study-Phones-03-270x530@2x.png
216 ms
US-residents-200w@2x.png
190 ms
03-Eligible-IconPhones-200x200-Desktop@2x.png
189 ms
original-medicare-200w@2x.png
222 ms
05-Reviews-5Stars-Small-96x20-Both@2x.png
240 ms
06-Privacy-Photo-740x500@2x.png
261 ms
lineto-circular-book.woff
374 ms
jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3A_yI0q14.ttf
109 ms
jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q14.ttf
119 ms
jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zI.ttf
175 ms
426834258593087
86 ms
collect
17 ms
collect
43 ms
05-Reviews-4_5Stars-Small-96x20-Both@2x.png
155 ms
ga-audiences
71 ms
heartline.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
heartline.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
heartline.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Heartline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Heartline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
heartline.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of HEARTLINE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: